Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD001471.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001471.pub2.

Educational games for mental health professionals

P S Bhoopathi  1 , R Sheoran
Affiliations

Educational games for mental health professionals

P S Bhoopathi et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: In traditional didactic teaching, the learner has a passive role, digesting the knowledge presented by the teacher. Stimulating and active teaching processes may be better at instilling information than more pedestrian approaches. Games involving repetition, reinforcement, association and use of multiple senses have been proposed as part of experiential learning.

Objectives: To assess the effects of educational games on the knowledge and clinical skill of mental health professionals compared to the effects of standard teaching approaches.

Search strategy: We performed electronic searches of AMED (1998 - November 2005), British Nursing Index (November 2005), Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2005), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (November 2005), CINAHL (November 2005) EMBASE (November 2005), Educational Resources Information Centre on CSA (1966 - November 2005), MEDLINE (November 2005), PsycINFO (November 2005). We also searched references of all selected articles and contacted authors of included trials for more information.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing any educational game aiming at increasing knowledge and/or skills with a standard educational approach for mental health professionals.

Data collection and analysis: We extracted data independently and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. We analysed the individual person data using fixed effect Peto Odds Ratio (OR) calculated the 95% confidence intervals (CI). If appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm (NNH) was estimated. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences.

Main results: We identified one trial (n=34) of an educational game for mental health nursing students of only a few hours follow up. For an outcome we arbitrarily defined ('no academically important improvement [a 10% improvement in scores]') those allocated to educational games fared considerably better than students in the standard education techniques group (OR 0.06 CI 0.01 to 0.27, NNT 3 CI 2 to 4). On average those in the games group scored six more points than the control students on a test of questions relevant to psychosis set to the standard of the mental health nursing curriculum of the day (WMD 6 CI 2.63 to 9.37).

Authors' conclusions: Current limited evidence suggests educational games could help mental health students gain more points in their tests, especially if they have left revision to the last minute. This salient study should be refined and repeated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL GAME + STANDARD TRAINING vs STANDARD TRAINING ALONE (all immediate‐term data), Outcome 1 Knowledge.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL GAME + STANDARD TRAINING vs STANDARD TRAINING ALONE (all immediate‐term data), Outcome 2 Knowledge: 2. Average test score (high = good).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL GAME + STANDARD TRAINING vs STANDARD TRAINING ALONE (all immediate‐term data), Outcome 3 Acceptability: leaving the study early.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001471

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Kelly 1992 {published data only}
    1. Kelly LS. Trivia‐Psychotica the Development and evaluation of an Educational Game for The Revision of Psychotic Disorders in a R.M.N. Training Programme. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 1995;2(6):366‐7. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Burke 2001 {published data only}
    1. Burke CT. The influences of teaching strategies and reinforcement techniques on health care workers' learning and retention. The University of Southern Mississippi 2001:176.
Gifford 2001 {published data only}
    1. Gifford KE. Using instructional games: a teaching strategy for increasing student particiaption and retension. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 2001;15:13‐21. - PubMed
Glendon 2005 {published data only}
    1. Glendon K, Ulrich D. Using games as a teaching strategy. Journal of Nursing Education 2005;44(7):338‐9. - PubMed
Haselhuhn 2005 {published data only}
    1. Haselhunhn MP, Mellers BA. Emotions and cooperation in economic games. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005;23(1):24‐33. - PubMed
Ingram 1998 {published data only}
    1. Ingram C, Ray K, Landeen J, Keane DR. Evaluation of an educational game for health sciences students. Jornal of Nursing Education 1998;37(6):240‐6. [ISSN‐0148‐4834 (Print)] - PubMed
Leblanc 1995 {published data only}
    1. Leblanc PA. Attitudes of nursing students towards the elderly as influenced by lecture discussion with and without simulation. The University of Southern Mississippi 1995:91.
McCahan 2002 {published data only}
    1. McCahan, C. Improving CNA Education with a game show. Geriatric Nursing 2002;23(4):200‐2. - PubMed
Metcalf 2003 {published data only}
    1. Metcalf B, Yankou D. Using games to help students understand ethics. Journal of Nursing Education 2003;42(5):212‐15. - PubMed
Skinner 2000 {published data only}
    1. Skinner K. Creating a game for sexuality and aging: the Sexual Dysfunction Trivia Game. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2000;31(4):185‐87. - PubMed
Stokamer 2000 {published data only}
    1. Stokamer C, Soccio D. Reinvigurating mandatory safety training. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2000;31(4):169‐73. - PubMed
Tankel 1999 {published data only}
    1. Tankel K, Wissmann J. Psychopharmacology RACE: a fun road to competence. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing 1999;37(2):30‐5. [ISSN‐0279‐3695 (Print)] - PubMed
Wargo 2000 {published data only}
    1. Wargo C. Blood Clot: gaming to reinforce learning about disseminated intravascular coagulation. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2000;31(4):149‐51. - PubMed
Youseffi 2000 {published data only}
    1. Youseffi F, Caldwell R, Hadnot P. Recall Rummy: learning can be fun. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2000;31(4):161‐2. - PubMed

Additional references

Altman 1996
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ 1996;313:1200. [EDU020600] - PMC - PubMed
Ausubel 1968
    1. Ausubel DP. Not available. Educational psycolchology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson, 1968.
Bastable 1997
    1. Bastable SB. Nursing as Educator. Principles of Teaching and Learning. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, 1997.
Becchetti 1995
    1. Becchetti, R. Shriners' challenge. A game format for a mandatory inservice program. Shriners' challenge. A game format for a mandatory inservice program 1995;11(2):83‐7. [ISSN‐0882‐0627 (Print)] - PubMed
Bland 1997
    1. Bland JM. Statistics notes. Trials randomised in clusters. BMJ 1997;315:600. - PMC - PubMed
Boissel 1999
    1. Boissel JP, Cucherat M, Li W, Chatellier G, Gueyffier F, Buyse M, et al. The problem of therapeutic efficacy indices. 3. Comparison of the indices and their use. Therapie 1999;54(4):405‐11. - PubMed
COD 1990
    1. Allen RE (ed). The concise Oxford dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Deeks 2000
    1. Deeks J. Issues in the selection for meta‐analyses of binary data. Abstracts of 8th International Cochrane Colloquium; 2000 Oct 25‐28th; Cape Town, South Africa. 2000.
Divine 1992
    1. Divine GW, Brown JT, Frazier LM. The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians' patient care behavior. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1992;7(6):623‐9. - PubMed
Donner 2002
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Issues in the meta‐analysis of cluster randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:2971‐80. - PubMed
Dwinnell 1998
    1. Dwinnell BG, Adams L. Problem‐based learning in medical education. Hospital Practice Office Edition 1998;33(11):15‐6. - PubMed
Gruending 1991
    1. Gruending DL, Fenty D, Hogan T. Fun and games in nursing staff development. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 1991;22(6):259‐62. [ISSN‐0022‐0124 (Print)] - PubMed
Gulliford 1999
    1. Gulliford MC. Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community based surveys and intervention studies: data from the health survey for England 1994. Merican Journal of Epidemiology 1999;149:876‐83. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐ analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration 2008.
Hoffman 1985
    1. Hoffman SB, Brand FR, Beatty PG, Hamill LA. Geriatrix: a role playing game. The Gerontologist 1985;25(6):568‐72. - PubMed
Kay 1986
    1. Kay SR, Opler LA, Fiszbein A. Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) manual. North Tonawanda (NY): Multi‐Health Systems, 1986.
Leucht 2005a
    1. Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel R. What does the PANSS mean?. Schizophrenia Research 2005;79:231‐8. - PubMed
Leucht 2005b
    1. Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel R. Clinical implications of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Scores. British Journal of Psychiatry 2005;187:366‐71. - PubMed
Lewis 1989
    1. Lewis DJ, Saydak SJ, Mierzwa IP, Robinson JA. Gaming: A teaching strategy for adult learners. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 1989;20(2):80‐3. - PubMed
Marshall 2000
    1. Marshall M, Lockwood A, Bradley C, Joy C, Fenton M. Unpublished rating scales ‐ a major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 2000;176:249‐52. - PubMed
McEvoy 1989
    1. McEvoy P. Teaching and learning: a climate of change. Nursing Standard 1989;9(3):36‐8. - PubMed
Moher 2001
    1. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before‐and‐after evaluation. JAMA 2001;285(15):1992‐5. [ISSN‐0098‐7484 (Print)] - PubMed
Newstrom 1980
    1. Newstrom WJ, Scannell EE. Games Trainers Play. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 1980.
Overall 1962
    1. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports 1962;10:799‐812.
Pfieffer 1980
    1. Pfieffer JW, Jones JE. Structured Experienence Kit. The Curriculum in Nursing Education. London: Croom Helm, 1980.
Quinn 1988
    1. Quinn FM. The Principles and Practice of Nurse Education. 2nd Edition. Suffolk: St Edmunds Press, 1988.
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408‐12. - PubMed
Ukoumunne 1999
    1. Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JAC, Burney PGJ. Methods for evaluating area‐wide and organisation‐based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 1999;3(5):iii‐92. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Wolkenheim 1990
    1. Wolkenheim BJ, Westdrop J. Games that teach: a practical approach. Journal of Nursing Staff Development 1990;6(1):45‐7. - PubMed

Publication types