Programming strategies for rapid aiming movements under simple and choice reaction time conditions
- PMID: 16627354
- DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000809
Programming strategies for rapid aiming movements under simple and choice reaction time conditions
Abstract
Increases in reaction time (RT) as a function of response complexity have been shown to differ between simple and choice RT tasks. Of interest in the present study was whether the influence of response complexity on RT depends on the extent to which movements are programmed in advance of movement initiation versus during execution (i.e., online). The task consisted of manual aiming movements to one or two targets (one- vs. two-element responses) under simple and choice RT conditions. The probe RT technique was employed to assess attention demands during RT and movement execution. Simple RT was greater for the two- than for the single-target responses but choice RT was not influenced by the number of elements. In both RT tasks, reaction times to the probe increased as a function of number of elements when the probe occurred during movement execution. The presence of the probe also caused an increase in aiming errors in the simple but not choice RT task. These findings indicated that online programming was occurring in both RT tasks. In the simple RT task, increased executive control mediated the integration between response elements through the utilization of visual feedback to facilitate the implementation of the second element.
Similar articles
-
The influence of advance information on the response complexity effect in manual aiming movements.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 22. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008. PMID: 17521597
-
Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2005-21. doi: 10.1037/a0037522. Epub 2014 Jul 28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014. PMID: 25068697
-
[Response force in probe reaction time tasks: reduction in capacity, response inhibition or bottle neck?].Z Exp Psychol. 2001;48(3):201-6. Z Exp Psychol. 2001. PMID: 11486637 German.
-
Programming of action timing cannot be completed until immediately prior to initiation of the response to be controlled.Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):821-832. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01740-9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020. PMID: 32514798 Review.
-
Preparing to react in the absence of uncertainty: I. New perspectives on simple reaction time.Br J Psychol. 1998 Nov;89 ( Pt 4):531-54. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02702.x. Br J Psychol. 1998. PMID: 9854803 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential beta-band event-related desynchronization during categorical action sequence planning.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059544. Epub 2013 Mar 18. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23527215 Free PMC article.
-
The violation of Fitts' Law: an examination of displacement biases and corrective submovements.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Aug;234(8):2151-63. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4618-4. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 26979439
-
Stimulation of subthalamic nuclei restores a near normal planning strategy in Parkinson's patients.PLoS One. 2013 May 3;8(5):e62793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062793. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23658775 Free PMC article.
-
Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(3):383-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1801-x. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19387624
-
Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm.Psychol Res. 2019 Sep;83(6):1194-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0945-8. Epub 2017 Dec 9. Psychol Res. 2019. PMID: 29224184
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources