FOLLOWPACE study: a prospective study on the cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker
- PMID: 16627411
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euj005
FOLLOWPACE study: a prospective study on the cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker
Abstract
Aims: This communication describes the design of the FOLLOWPACE study. The overall aim of FOLLOWPACE is to quantify the cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker (PM). Specific aims are (i) to quantify the incidence of complications and the quality of life 1 year after PM implantation; (ii) to quantify which baseline characteristics measured during implantation are predictors of the occurrence of complications and quality of life after 1 year; (iii) to determine the added predictive value of follow-up measurements to improve the efficiency of follow-up and to demonstrate which follow-up measurements are redundant.
Methods and results: FOLLOWPACE is a prospective, observational, prognostic cohort study. About 40 PM centres in the Netherlands will participate to include about 2,500 patients. Each patient aged >or=18 receiving a PM for the first time is eligible. At baseline, i.e. time of implantation, all potential predictors of complications and quality of life after 1 year are documented. After implantation, follow-up visits will be carried out conforming with routine care, usually three in the first year. At these visits, other potential prognostic predictors will be documented. Primary outcome is the incidence of PM- or cardiac complications at 1 year. Secondary outcome parameters are quality of life and costs after 1 year.
Conclusion: This study will lead to definition of a more efficient routine follow-up schedule for patients with a PM, aiming to reduce time and energy while preserving the safety of pacing therapy and the prognosis of the patient. The study will ultimately provide evidence-based guidelines for PM follow-up including knowledge of the responsibilities of cardiologists, technicians, and representatives of PM manufacturers.
Similar articles
-
Routine follow-up after pacemaker implantation: frequency, pacemaker programming and professionals in charge.Europace. 2008 Jul;10(7):832-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun093. Epub 2008 Apr 17. Europace. 2008. PMID: 18420650
-
Predictors of improved quality of life 1 year after pacemaker implantation.Am Heart J. 2008 Sep;156(3):491-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Jul 21. Am Heart J. 2008. PMID: 18760131
-
Incidence and predictors of in-hospital events after first implantation of pacemakers.Europace. 2007 Oct;9(10):884-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum113. Epub 2007 Jun 7. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17556376
-
[Follow-up after oncological surgery].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Nov 24;145(47):2261-4. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001. PMID: 11760605 Review. Dutch.
-
[Ambulatory control and follow-up of patients carrying a unicameral pacemaker].Rev Esp Cardiol. 1990;43 Suppl 2:32-9. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1990. PMID: 2236796 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Clinical electrophysiology in the Netherlands: where do we stand?Neth Heart J. 2017 Oct;25(10):533-535. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1030-z. Epub 2017 Aug 2. Neth Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28770397 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Impact of data collected on implanted devices and device recipients.Neth Heart J. 2008 Oct;16(Suppl 1):S9-S11. Neth Heart J. 2008. PMID: 18958271 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical