Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):969-71.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7547.969.

Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Review

Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials

Jo C Dumville et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Loss to follow-up can greatly affect the strength of a trial's findings. But most reports do not give readers enough information for them to be able to understand the potential effects

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Is your trial fall proof? Credit: www.safehip.com

References

    1. Tierney JF, Stewart LA. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34: 79-87. - PubMed
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319: 670-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 2002;325: 652-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hewitt, CE, Hahn S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J, Bland M. Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals. BMJ 2005;330: 1057-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2001;357: 1191-4. - PubMed

MeSH terms