Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;100(3):189-204.
doi: 10.1179/136485906X91512.

A global assessment of closed forests, deforestation and malaria risk

Affiliations

A global assessment of closed forests, deforestation and malaria risk

C A Guerra et al. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Global environmental change is expected to affect profoundly the transmission of the parasites that cause human malaria. Amongst the anthropogenic drivers of change, deforestation is arguably the most conspicuous, and its rate is projected to increase in the coming decades. The canonical epidemiological understanding is that deforestation increases malaria risk in Africa and the Americas and diminishes it in South-east Asia. Partial support for this position is provided here, through a systematic review of the published literature on deforestation, malaria and the relevant vector bionomics. By using recently updated boundaries for the spatial limits of malaria and remotely-sensed estimates of tree cover, it has been possible to determine the population at risk of malaria in closed forest, at least for those malaria-endemic countries that lie within the main blocks of tropical forest. Closed forests within areas of malaria risk cover approximately 1.5 million km2 in the Amazon region, 1.4 million km2 in Central Africa, 1.2 million km2 in the Western Pacific, and 0.7 million km2 in South-east Asia. The corresponding human populations at risk of malaria within these forests total 11.7 million, 18.7 million, 35.1 million and 70.1 million, respectively. By coupling these numbers with the country-specific rates of deforestation, it has been possible to rank malaria-endemic countries according to their potential for change in the population at risk of malaria, as the result of deforestation. The on-going research aimed at evaluating these relationships more quantitatively, through the Malaria Atlas Project (MAP), is highlighted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
The global spatial limits of malaria in 2005 (formula image) overlaid on the areas of closed forests [formula image; as indicated on the Global Forest Cover map (Anon., 2001a)]. The Amazon region (AR), Central Africa (CA), South–east Asia (SEA) and the Western Pacific (WP) are roughly indicated; the sinuous limit between SEA and WP is based on the map of malaria zones developed by Macdonald (1957).
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Regional comparisons of (a) the areas of closed forest (□) and malarious closed forest (■), and (b) the populations at risk of malaria within areas of closed forest.

References

    1. Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig HJ, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau JP. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science. 2002;297:999–1002. - PubMed
    1. Anon . International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; Paris: 1973.
    1. Anon . FRA 2000 — Global Forest Cover Mapping Final Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome: 2001a.
    1. Anon . Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 — Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome: 2001b.
    1. Anon . Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. World Resources Institute; Washington, DC: 2005.

Publication types