Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas
- PMID: 16632651
- PMCID: PMC2672718
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.071928
Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas
Abstract
Application of technology in neonatal intensive care has been very successful in reducing mortality, particularly in extremely low birthweight infants. As survival has improved, the need for accurate studies of long term outcome has increased. This need has been met by studies that are larger, more inclusive, and address a wider variety of later outcomes. Rather than a comprehensive quantitative review of these studies, this article uses a smaller number of studies that focus on infants of borderline viability, to illustrate current dilemmas and challenges in interpretation, and the actions, both individual and societal, that may be prompted by these interpretations.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: none declared
References
-
- Lorenz J, Wooliever D, Jetton J.et al A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc 1998152425–435. - PubMed
-
- Bhutta A, Cleves M, Casey P.et al Cognitive and behavioural outcomes of school‐aged children who were born preterm. JAMA 2002288728–737. - PubMed
-
- Hack M, Fanaroff A. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Semin Neonatol 200089–106. - PubMed
-
- Ho S, Saigal S. Current survival and early outcomes of infants of borderline viability. NeoReviews 20056c123–c132.
-
- Wilson‐Costello D, Friedman H, Minich N.et al Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics 2005115997–1003. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous