Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;243(5):673-80; discussion 680-3.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000216763.27673.97.

Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution's experience with an increasingly common diagnosis

Affiliations

Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution's experience with an increasingly common diagnosis

Jordan M Winter et al. Ann Surg. 2006 May.

Abstract

Background: While incidental masses in certain organs have received particular attention, periampullary and pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) remain poorly characterized.

Methods: We reviewed 1944 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) over an 8-year period (April 1997 to October 2005). A total of 118 patients (6% of all PDs) presented with an incidental finding of a periampullary or pancreatic mass. The PI patients were analyzed and compared with the rest of the cohort (NI, nonincidentaloma group, n = 1826).

Results: Thirty-one percent of the PI patients (n = 37) had malignant disease (versus 76% of the NI patients, P < 0.001), 47% (n = 55) had premalignant disease, and the remaining 22% (n = 26) had little or no risk for malignant progression. The 3 most common diagnoses in the PI group were IPMN without invasive cancer (30%), cystadenoma (17%), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (10%). The PI group had a higher overall complication rate (55% versus 43%, P = 0.02), due in part to a significantly increased rate of pancreatic fistulas (18.4% PI versus 8.5% NI, P < 0.001). Patients in the PI group with malignant disease had a superior long-term survival (median, 30 months, P = 0.01) compared with patients in the NI group with malignant disease (median, 21 months).

Conclusions: Incidentally discovered periampullary and pancreatic masses comprise a substantial proportion of patients undergoing PD. Roughly three fourths of these lesions are malignant or premalignant, and amenable to curative resection. Resected malignant PIs have favorable pathologic features as compared with resected malignant NIs, and resection of these early lesions in asymptomatic individuals is associated with improved survival, compared with patients with symptomatic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients who underwent a PD for a PI, as compared with patients who presented with symptoms (NI). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the PI group were 95%, 88%, and 68%, respectively (median, 82 months, P < 0.001). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the NI group were 76%, 57%, and 36%, respectively (median, 33 months). PI, periampullary or pancreatic incidentaloma; NI, nonincidentaloma.
None
FIGURE 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients who underwent a PD for an invasive cancer (in situ lesions are excluded) in the PI group, as compared with patients who presented with symptoms (NI). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the PI group were 93%, 70%, and 50%, respectively (median, 30 months, P = 0.01). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the NI group were 70%, 46%, and 23%, respectively (median, 21 months). PI, periampullary or pancreatic incidentaloma; NI, nonincidentaloma.
None
FIGURE 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients who underwent a PD for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the PI group, as compared with the patients who presented with symptoms (NI). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the PI group were 100%, 62%, and 50%, respectively (median, 28 months, P = 0.04). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in the NI group were 64%, 38%, and 14%, respectively (median, 18 months). PI, periampullary or pancreatic incidentaloma; NI, nonincidentaloma.

References

    1. emedicine CH. CT Scan Introduction. CT Scan. 2005 August 10, 2005 [cited 2005 October 14, 2005]; Available from: http://www.emedicinehealth.com/articles/11618–1.asp.
    1. Indrajit IK, D'souza JD. Multislice CT: a quantum leap in whole body imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2004 2004;14:209–216.
    1. Davis W. Multi-Slice CT: 64 and Counting. Med Imaging. 2005.
    1. Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr. National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:321–329. - PubMed
    1. Brant-Zawadzki M. CT screening: why I do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:319–326. - PubMed