Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;24(3):313-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.11.012.

Referent d-dimer enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing is of limited value in the exclusion of thromboembolic disease: result of a practical study in an ED

Affiliations

Referent d-dimer enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing is of limited value in the exclusion of thromboembolic disease: result of a practical study in an ED

Patrick Ray et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess in clinical practice the accuracy of a referent d-dimer enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the exclusion of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED).

Patients and methods: An observational prospective study took place in an emergency department; 205 consecutive outpatients suspected of having VTED were included. Blood samples were collected at admission for VIDAS DD measurement. Venous thromboembolic disease was confirmed by standard clinical imaging. All patients were followed up at 3 months.

Results: Venous thromboembolic disease was confirmed in 57 patients (28%). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of a DD assay lower than 500 ng/mL were 78% (95% confidence interval = 67%-87%) and 84% (95% confidence interval = 73%-90%), respectively. Twelve patients had a false-negative DD with one or more of the following: (a) symptoms reported for more than 15 days (n = 2), (b) prior anticoagulation (n = 3), (c) distal VTED (n = 5), or (d) high clinical probability (n = 3).

Conclusion: In our cohort of patients, DD was less accurate than previously reported, with an upper estimate of the sensitivity of only 87%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Substances

LinkOut - more resources