Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions
- PMID: 16635804
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.03.009
Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions
Abstract
This article reviews the application of consensus scoring for cases when the target 3D structure is known. Comparing the performance of different methods is not a trivial task, and it appears that consensus scoring usually substantially improves virtual screening performance, contributing to better enrichments. It also seems to improve--albeit less dramatically--the prediction of bound conformations and poses. The prediction of binding energies is still rather inaccurate and although consensus scoring generally improves these predictions, more development is required before it can be used for this purpose in routine lead optimization.
Similar articles
-
The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008 May;11(3):356-64. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008. PMID: 18428089 Review.
-
Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):319-32. doi: 10.1021/ci7003626. Epub 2008 Jan 23. J Chem Inf Model. 2008. PMID: 18211051
-
Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):747-54. doi: 10.1021/ci700464x. Epub 2008 Mar 5. J Chem Inf Model. 2008. PMID: 18318474
-
Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques.J Mol Graph Model. 2003 Sep;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/S1093-3263(03)00123-2. J Mol Graph Model. 2003. PMID: 12798388
-
Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007 May;10(3):275-80. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007. PMID: 17554853 Review.
Cited by
-
DyScore: A Boosting Scoring Method with Dynamic Properties for Identifying True Binders and Nonbinders in Structure-Based Drug Discovery.J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Nov 28;62(22):5550-5567. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00926. Epub 2022 Nov 3. J Chem Inf Model. 2022. PMID: 36327102 Free PMC article.
-
CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Sep 26;51(9):2115-31. doi: 10.1021/ci200269q. Epub 2011 Aug 29. J Chem Inf Model. 2011. PMID: 21809884 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor GluN1-Ligand Binding Affinity by a Novel SVM-Pose/SVM-Score Combinatorial Ensemble Docking Scheme.Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 6;7:40053. doi: 10.1038/srep40053. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28059133 Free PMC article.
-
Structure-based drug repositioning over the human TMPRSS2 protease domain: search for chemical probes able to repress SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein cleavages.Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020 Oct 1;153:105495. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105495. Epub 2020 Jul 28. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020. PMID: 32730844 Free PMC article.
-
A facile consensus ranking approach enhances virtual screening robustness and identifies a cell-active DYRK1α inhibitor.Future Med Chem. 2018 Oct;10(20):2411-2430. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2018-0198. Epub 2018 Oct 16. Future Med Chem. 2018. PMID: 30325204 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources