How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on
- PMID: 16636704
- PMCID: PMC1435857
How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on
Erratum in
- J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):354
Abstract
Objective: The researchers sought to assess whether the widely used 1994 Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE could be improved in terms of sensitivity, precision, or parsimony.
Methods: A gold standard of 1,347 RCT records and a comparison group of 2,400 non-trials were randomly selected from MEDLINE. Terms occurring in at least 1% of RCT records were identified. Fifty percent of the RCT and comparison group records were randomly selected, and the ability of the terms to discriminate RCTs from non-trial records was determined using logistic regression. The best performing combinations of terms were tested on the remaining records and in MEDLINE.
Results: The best discriminating term was "Clinical Trial" (Publication Type). In years where the Cochrane assessment of MEDLINE records had taken place, the strategies identified few additional unindexed records of trials. In years where Cochrane assessment has yet to take place, "Randomized Controlled Trial" (Publication Type) proved highly sensitive and precise. Adding six more search terms identified further, unindexed trials at reasonable levels of precision and with sensitivity almost equal to the Cochrane HSSS.
Conclusions: Most reports of RCTs in MEDLINE can now be identified easily using "Randomized Controlled Trial" (Publication Type). More sensitive searches can be achieved by a brief strategy, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination/Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (2005 revision).
Figures
Comment in
-
Response to Glanville et al.: How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):117-8; author reply 119-20. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.117. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17443240 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Response to Glanville et al.J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):118-9; author reply 119-20. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17443241 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- The Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane library. [Web document]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. [cited 10 Oct 2005]. <http://www.thecochranelibrary.com>.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Technology assessments. [Web document]. Rockville, MD: The Agency, 2005. [cited 24 Mar 2005]. <http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/techix.htm>.
-
- Clinical evidence. London, UK: BMJ Books, 2005.
-
- American College of Physicians. ACP journal club. [Web document]. Philadelphia, PA: The College, 2005. [cited 10 Oct 2005]. <http://www.acpjc.org/?hp>.
-
- Lefebvre C. Identification of randomized controlled trials using MEDLINE: the situation in 1993. In: An evidence-based health care system: the case for clinical registries. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, Office of Medical Applications of Research, 1993:23–8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources