Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Mar;21 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S47-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00374.x.

Are there gender differences in diabetes care among elderly Medicare enrolled veterans?

Chin-Lin Tseng  1 , Usha Sambamoorthi, Mangala Rajan, Anjali Tiwari, Susan Frayne, Patricia Findley, Leonard Pogach
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Are there gender differences in diabetes care among elderly Medicare enrolled veterans?

Chin-Lin Tseng et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To examine gender differences in diabetes care process measures and intermediate outcomes among veteran clinic users.

Design: A retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare files of VHA clinic users with diabetes. Diabetes care process measures were tests for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) values, and eye exams. Intermediate outcomes were HbA1c and LDL-C values below recommended thresholds. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were used to assess gender differences.

Participants: Study population included 3,225 women and 231,922 men veterans with diabetes, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service and alive at the end of fiscal year 2000.

Results: Overall, there were no significant gender differences in HbA1c or LDL-C testing. However, women had higher rates in these process measures than men among the non-African American minorities. Women were more likely to have completed eye exams (odds ratio [OR]=1.11; 99% confidence interval [CI]=1.10, 1.23) but were less likely to have LDL-C under 130 mg/dL (OR=0.77; 99% CI=0.69, 0.87).

Conclusions: Among VHA patients with diabetes, clinically significant gender inequality was not apparent in most of diabetes care measures. However, there was evidence of better care among nonwhite and non-African American women than their male counterparts. Further research on interaction of race and gender on diabetes care is needed. This includes evaluation of integrated VHA women's health programs as well as cultural issues. Lower LDL-C control among women suggests areas of unmet needs for women and opportunities for future targeted quality improvement interventions at system and provider levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Diabetes prevalence among American Indians and Alaska natives and the overall population—United States, 1994–2002. MMWR. 2003;52:702–4. - PubMed
    1. Miller DR, Safford MM, Pogach LM. Who has diabetes? Best estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Department of Veterans Affairs based on computerized patient data. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:10–21. - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990–1998. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1278–83. - PubMed
    1. Birnbaum H, Leong S, Kabra A. Lifetime medical costs for women: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and stress urinary incontinence. Womens Health Issues. 2003;13:204–13. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917–32. - PubMed

Publication types