Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr 25:6:25.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-25.

Learning to mark: a qualitative study of the experiences and concerns of medical markers

Affiliations

Learning to mark: a qualitative study of the experiences and concerns of medical markers

Kamila Hawthorne et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Although there is published research on the methods markers use in marking various types of assessment, there is relatively little information on the processes markers use in approaching a marking exercise. This qualitative paper describes the preparation and experiences of general practice (GP) teachers who undertake marking a written assessment in an undergraduate medical course.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven of the 16 GP tutors on an undergraduate course. The purposive sample comprised two new markers, two who had marked for a couple of years and three experienced markers. Each respondent was interviewed twice, once following a formative assessment of a written case study, and again after a summative assessment. All interviews were audio-taped and analysed for emerging themes. A respondent validation exercise was conducted with all 16 GP tutors.

Results: Markers had internal concerns about their ability to mark fairly and made considerable efforts to calibrate their marking. They needed guidance and coaching when marking for the first time and adopted a variety of marking styles, reaching a decision through a number of routes. Dealing with pass/fail borderline scripts and the consequences of the mark on the student were particular concerns. Even experienced markers felt the need to calibrate their marks both internally and externally

Conclusion: Previous experience of marking appears to improve markers' confidence and is a factor in determining the role which markers adopt. Confidence can be improved by giving clear instructions, along with examples of marking. The authors propose that one method of providing this support and coaching could be by a process of peer review of a selection of papers prior to the main marking. New markers in particular would benefit from further guidance, however they are influenced by others early on in their marking career and course organisers should be mindful of this when arranging double marking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolfe EW. The relationship between essay reading style and scoring proficiency in a psychometric scoring system. Assessing Writing. 1997;4:83–106. doi: 10.1016/S1075-2935(97)80006-2. - DOI
    1. Weigle SC. Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment; Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Assessing Writing. 1999;6:145–178. doi: 10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00010-6. - DOI
    1. Cannings R, Hawthorne K, Hood K, Houston H. Putting Double Marking to the test: a framework for assessing if its worth the trouble. Med Ed. 2005;39:299–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02093.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. 2. London: Sage; 1994.
    1. Loftland J, Loftland L. Analyzing Social Settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. London: Wadsworth; 1995.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources