Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 May;56(526):363-8.

A profile of communication in primary care physician telephone consultations: application of the Roter Interaction Analysis System

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A profile of communication in primary care physician telephone consultations: application of the Roter Interaction Analysis System

Michael Innes et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 May.

Abstract

Background: Telephone consultations are a part of everyday practice, there is surprisingly little research on the subject.

Aim: To describe the variation of consulting skills within a body of telephone consultations in primary care, highlighting the performance of one method of assessing the process of the consultation-- the Roter Interaction Analysis System-- with telephone consultations.

Design of study: Cross sectional study of 43 recordings of telephone consultations with GPs.

Setting: One rural county in the Midlands.

Method: Recordings were made of 8 GPs, purposively selected for maximum variance in one region of the UK. Forty-three consultations were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. From the descriptive categories, six composite categories were compiled reflecting a number of domains of interaction in a consultation: rapport, data gathering, patient education and counselling, partnership building, doctor dominance and patient-centredness. Analysis of variance was undertaken to explain variations between consultations for the different domains. Comparison was made to findings from similar work for face-to-face consultations.

Results: These telephone consultations feature more biomedical information exchange than psychosocial or affective communication. Length of interaction accounts for much of the variation seen between consultations in the domains of rapport, data gathering, patient education and counselling and partnership. Male doctors are more patient centred in this study. There is the suggestion of more doctor dominance and a less patient-centred approach when comparisons are made with previous work on face-to-face consultations.

Conclusions: Although the telephone is increasingly being used to provide care, this study highlights the fact that telephone consultations cannot be taken as equivalent to those conducted face to face. More work needs to be done to delineate the features of telephone consultations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aronson S. The lancet on the telephone 1876–1975. Med Hist. 1977;21:69–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crouch R, Dale J, Patel A, et al. London: King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry; 1996. Ringing the changes: developing, piloting and evaluating a telephone advice system in Accident & Emergency and General Practice settings.
    1. Larsen JH, Risor O. Telephone consultations at the emergency service, Copenhagen County: Analysis of doctor–patient communication patterns. Fam Pract. 1997;14:387–393. - PubMed
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Telephone consultations. BMJ. 2003;326:966–969. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman JL, Zechel A, Carter YH, et al. Systematic review of recent innovations in service provision to improve access to primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:374–381. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types