Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar;41(3):162-4.

[Effects of general anesthesia for cesarean section on infants]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 16640879

[Effects of general anesthesia for cesarean section on infants]

[Article in Chinese]
Chong-hua Li et al. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the safety of general anesthesia during cesarean section for neonates.

Methods: Singleton pregnant women for whom elective cesarean sections were planned after 37 gestation weeks were allocated to general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia. After preoxygenation, general anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (2.0 microg/kg), propofol (1.5 mg/kg) and vencuronium (0.08 mg/kg) followed by tracheal intubation. Oxygen-nitrous oxides (50%) was inhaled before delivery. Epidural anesthesia was performed at L(1 - 2) or L(2 - 3) on the left lateral decubitus position with 1.73% lidocaine carbonate (including 1:200 000 adrenaline). We studied arterial samples withdrawn from the infants 30 min after birth for the pH, PaO(2), PaCO(2), SPO(2) and Hct. Neonatal behavioral neurological assessments (NBNA) 3 - 5 days after birth were recorded.

Results: (1) The pH, PaO(2), PaCO(2), SPO(2) and Hct in the general anesthesia group were 7.34 +/- 0.08, (40 +/- 11) mm Hg, (73 +/- 17) mm Hg, (96.8 +/- 1.0)%, and (53 +/- 5)%, while in the epidural anesthesia group were 7.35 +/- 0.05, (41 +/- 8) mm Hg, (71 +/- 17) mm Hg, (96.6 +/- 1.0)%, and (54 +/- 6)%. (2) NBNA scores: In the general anesthesia group, neonatal adaptive capacity, passive tone, active tone, primary reflexes and general status were 12.6 +/- 0.7, 7.2 +/- 0.7, 7.4 +/- 0.6, 5.6 +/- 0.8, and 5.9 +/- 0.3 respectively. While in the epidural anesthesia group they were 13.4 +/- 0.8, 7.3 +/- 0.5, 7.3 +/- 0.8, 5.6 +/- 0.6, and 5.9 +/- 0.3 respectively. No significant difference was seen (P > 0.05) between the general anesthesia group and the epidural anesthesia group in NBNA scores, mean pH, PaO(2), PaCO(2), SPO(2) and Hct of newborn infants.

Conclusion: It study suggests that general anesthesia for the elective cesarean section does not influence significantly the outcome of the newborn infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms