Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers
- PMID: 16643306
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.x
Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers
Abstract
Recent improvements in genetic analysis and genotyping methods have resulted in a rapid expansion of the power of molecular markers to address ecological questions. Microsatellites have emerged as the most popular and versatile marker type for ecological applications. The rise of commercial services that can isolate microsatellites for new study species and genotype samples at reasonable prices presents ecologists with the unprecedented ability to employ genetic approaches without heavy investment in specialized equipment. Nevertheless, the lack of accessible, synthesized information on the practicalities and pitfalls of using genetic tools impedes ecologists' ability to make informed decisions on using molecular approaches and creates the risk that some will use microsatellites without understanding the steps needed to evaluate the quality of a genetic data set. The first goal of this synthesis is to provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of microsatellite markers and the risks, cost and time requirements of isolating and using microsatellites with the aid of commercial services. The second goal is to encourage the use and consistent reporting of thorough marker screening to ensure high quality data. To that end, we present a multistep screening process to evaluate candidate loci for inclusion in a genetic study that is broadly targeted to both novice and experienced geneticists alike.
Similar articles
-
High-throughput microsatellite genotyping in ecology: improved accuracy, efficiency, standardization and success with low-quantity and degraded DNA.Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 May;17(3):492-507. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12594. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017. PMID: 27505280
-
Rise of the machines--recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development.Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Nov;11(6):1093-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03037.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011. PMID: 21679314
-
Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA.Chromosoma. 2000 Sep;109(6):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s004120000089. Chromosoma. 2000. PMID: 11072791 Review.
-
Microsatellite data analysis for population genetics.Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1006:271-95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-389-3_19. Methods Mol Biol. 2013. PMID: 23546798
-
Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis.Mol Ecol. 2002 Sep;11(9):1591-604. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01576.x. Mol Ecol. 2002. PMID: 12207711 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.Ecol Evol. 2014 Nov;4(22):4399-428. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1305. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Ecol Evol. 2014. PMID: 25540699 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular evidence of polyandry in the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e68241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068241. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23844173 Free PMC article.
-
Particle backtracking improves breeding subpopulation discrimination and natal-source identification in mixed populations.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0120752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120752. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25799555 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing population structure and migration patterns of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Japan.Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 1;13(1):21186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48215-0. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38040788 Free PMC article.
-
Unusual evolution of tree frog populations in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.Evol Appl. 2022 Jan 26;15(2):203-219. doi: 10.1111/eva.13282. eCollection 2022 Feb. Evol Appl. 2022. PMID: 35233243 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical