Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Nov;92(11):1661-6.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.084822. Epub 2006 Apr 27.

Stenting of hypoplastic aortic segments with mild pressure gradients and arterial hypertension

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Stenting of hypoplastic aortic segments with mild pressure gradients and arterial hypertension

D Boshoff et al. Heart. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of stent expansion of hypoplastic aortic segments with pressure gradients in patients with arterial hypertension.

Design: Non-randomised prospective clinical trial.

Setting: Tertiary referral centre, congenital cardiac unit.

Patient selection: 20 consecutive patients (median age 14.5 years, range 11.6-38.8 years) with arterial hypertension and a hypoplastic segment of the aorta. Seventeen patients had successful previous arch interventions in a coarctation site.

Interventions: Stent deployment in hypoplastic arch segments.

Main outcome measures: Gradient across the aortic arch; complications early and during follow up; residual hypertension.

Results: 23 stents were deployed: 13 in the cross and 10 in the isthmus. The mean gradient across the aortic arch decreased from 16 (SD 6) (median 17) to 3 (4) (median 1) mm Hg (p < 0.001). In a few patients a mild gradient persisted just distal to the left carotid artery due to residual orificial narrowing or acute angulation. No complications occurred during or after the procedure. During follow up of 2.2 years (range 0.2-4.8 years) arterial hypertension resolved in 10 patients and 10 required residual drug treatment with better control of blood pressures.

Conclusions: Pressure loss due to residual hypoplastic aortic segments can be treated effectively and safely with stent expansion. Some patients remain mildly hypertensive and require additional drug treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vriend J W, Mulder B J. Late complications in patients after repair of aortic coarctation: implications for management. Int J Cardiol 2005101399–406. - PubMed
    1. Weber H S, Cyran S E, Grzeszczak M.et al Discrepancies in aortic growth explain aortic arch gradients during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993211002–1007. - PubMed
    1. Vriend J W J, Zwinderman A H, De Groot E.et al Predictive value of mild, residual descending aortic narrowing for blood pressure and vascular damage in patients after repair of aortic coarctation. Eur Heart J 20052684–90. - PubMed
    1. Clarkson P M, Nicholson M R, Barrat‐Boyes B G.et al Results after repair of coarctation of the aorta beyond infancy: a 10 to 28 year follow‐up with particular reference to late systemic hypertension.Am J Cardiol 1983511481–1488. - PubMed
    1. Cohen M, Fuster V, Steele P M.et al Coarctation of the aorta: long‐term follow‐up and prediction of outcome after surgical correction. Circulation 198980840–845. - PubMed

Publication types