On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors
- PMID: 16644968
- DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci611
On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors
Abstract
Measurements of the response of thermoluminescent (TL) detectors after gamma ray doses high enough to observe signal saturation provide input to microdosimetric models which relate this gamma-ray response with the energy response after low doses of photons (gamma rays and low-energy X rays) and after high-LET irradiation. To measure their gamma ray response up to saturation, LiF:Mg,Ti (MTS-7 and MTT), LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP-7), CaSO4:Dy (KCD) and Al2O3:C detectors were irradiated with 60Co gamma rays over the range 1-5000 Gy. The X-ray photon energy response and TL efficiency (relative to gamma rays) after doses of beta rays and alpha particles, were also measured, for CaSO4:Dy and for Al2O3:C. Microdosimetric and track structure modelling was then applied to the experimental data. In a manner similar to LiF:Mg,Cu,P, the experimentally observed under response of alpha-Al2O3:C to X rays <100 keV, compared with cross-section calculations, is explained as a microdosimetric effect caused by the saturation of response of this detector without prior supralinearity (saturation of traps along the tracks). The enhanced X-ray photon energy response of CaSO4:Dy is related to the supralinearity observed in this material after high gamma ray doses, similarly to that in LiF:Mg,Ti. The discussed model approaches support the general rule relating dose-, energy- and ionisation density-responses in TL detectors: if their gamma ray response is sublinear prior to saturation, the measured photon energy response is lower, and if it is supralinear, it may be higher than that expected from the calculation of the interaction cross sections alone. Since similar rules have been found to apply to other solid-state detector systems, microdosimetry may offer a valuable contribution to solid-state dosimetry even prior to mechanistic explanations of physical phenomena in different TL detectors.
Similar articles
-
Microdosimetric modelling of the response of thermoluminescence detectors to low- and high-LET ionising radiation.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;122(1-4):378-81. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl467. Epub 2007 Jan 29. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 17261540
-
Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;119(1-4):353-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci627. Epub 2006 Apr 27. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 16644960
-
Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;119(1-4):483-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncj001. Epub 2006 Jul 5. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 16822775
-
Theories of TL systems: failures, successes, conflicts, trends: insights into possible future materials and techniques.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;119(1-4):124-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci695. Epub 2006 Apr 3. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 16585259 Review.
-
The effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence response (efficiency) of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;109(4):331-48. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch310. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004. PMID: 15273352 Review.
Cited by
-
MICRODOSIMETRIC UNDERSTANDING OF DOSE RESPONSE AND RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF THERMOLUMINESCENCE DETECTORS.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020 Dec 30;192(2):165-177. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa211. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020. PMID: 33418564 Free PMC article.
-
Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 7;58(21):7463-79. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7463. Epub 2013 Oct 8. Phys Med Biol. 2013. PMID: 24099782 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous