Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing
- PMID: 16645103
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17354
Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing
Abstract
We compared the five- to seven-year clinical and radiological results of the metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing with a hybrid total hip arthroplasty in two groups of 54 hips, matched for gender, age, body mass index and activity level. Function was excellent in both groups, as measured by the Oxford hip score, but the Birmingham hip resurfacings had higher University of California at Los Angeles activity scores and better EuroQol quality of life scores. The total hip arthroplasties had a revision or intention-to-revise rate of 8%, and the Birmingham hip resurfacings of 6%. Both groups demonstrated impending failure on surrogate end-points. Of the total hip arthroplasties, 12% had polyethylene wear and osteolysis under observation, and 8% of Birmingham hip resurfacings showed migration of the femoral component. Polyethylene wear was present in 48% of the hybrid hips without osteolysis. Of the femoral components in the Birmingham hip resurfacing group which had not migrated, 66% had radiological changes of unknown significance.
Similar articles
-
A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Feb;93(2):158-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25625. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011. PMID: 21282752
-
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1137-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20524. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008. PMID: 18757951
-
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2663-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01715. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. PMID: 21084576
-
Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):120-7. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583538 Review.
-
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.01.002. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20399365 Review.
Cited by
-
Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4860-x. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27121872 Free PMC article.
-
Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2301-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1301-0. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 20232182 Free PMC article.
-
Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0465-3. Epub 2008 Oct 8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 18841436 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1516-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0456-4. Epub 2008 Aug 22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 18719971 Free PMC article.
-
Low rates of heterotopic ossification after resurfacing hip arthroplasty with use of prophylactic radiotherapy in select patients.J Arthroplasty. 2012 Aug;27(7):1349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.017. Epub 2012 Jan 14. J Arthroplasty. 2012. PMID: 22245125 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical