Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists
- PMID: 16646276
- DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.3.2
Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the list equivalency of the 18 QuickSIN (Quick Speech in Noise test) lists. Individuals with normal hearing (n = 24) and with sensorineural hearing loss (n = 72) were studied. Mean recognition performances on the 18 lists by the listeners with normal hearing were 2.8 to 4.3 dB SNR (signal-to-noise ratio), whereas the range was 10.0 to 14.3 dB SNR for the listeners with hearing loss. The psychometric functions for each list showed high performance variability across lists for listeners with hearing loss but not for listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing loss, Lists 4, 5, 13, and 16 fell outside of the critical difference. The data from this study suggest nine lists that provide homogenous results for listeners with and without hearing loss. Finally, there was an 8.7 dB difference in performances between the two groups indicating a more favorable signal-to-noise ratio required by the listeners with hearing loss to obtain equal performance.
Comment in
-
Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists.J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Sep;17(8):617-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.8.8. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006. PMID: 16999256 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):844-56. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17675590 Clinical Trial.
-
The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Sep;23(8):590-605. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.9. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22967734 Clinical Trial.
-
Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. doi: 10.1121/1.1784440. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004. PMID: 15532670
-
The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):92-6. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.3. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22353677
-
Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.Int J Audiol. 2017 Nov;56(11):844-853. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1333634. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Int J Audiol. 2017. PMID: 28587489
Cited by
-
The impairment of speech perception in noise following pure tone hearing recovery in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03847-y. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35039548 Free PMC article.
-
Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.Neurosci Lett. 2021 Feb 16;746:135664. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135664. Epub 2021 Jan 23. Neurosci Lett. 2021. PMID: 33497718 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):325-339. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16051. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017. PMID: 28418327 Free PMC article.
-
Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3477-86. doi: 10.1121/1.4921601. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015. PMID: 26093435 Free PMC article.
-
Right-Ear Advantage for Speech-in-Noise Recognition in Patients with Nonlateralized Tinnitus and Normal Hearing Sensitivity.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr;19(2):211-221. doi: 10.1007/s10162-017-0647-3. Epub 2017 Nov 27. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29181615 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous