Spinal cord stimulation for critical leg ischemia: a review of effectiveness and optimal patient selection
- PMID: 16647594
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.013
Spinal cord stimulation for critical leg ischemia: a review of effectiveness and optimal patient selection
Abstract
Patients suffering from inoperable critical leg ischemia (CLI) ultimately face a major amputation. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been introduced as a possible treatment option. This paper presents the best available evidence from a systematic review on the effectiveness of SCS in these patients and discusses the indications for SCS therapy. A meta-analysis of six controlled trials, including 444 patients, showed 11% (95% confidence interval: -0.02 to -0.20) lower amputation rate after 12 months compared to those treated with optimum medical treatment. In addition, SCS patients required significantly fewer analgesics and showed a significant clinical improvement. These positive effects have to be weighed against the higher costs and (generally minor) complications of SCS. TcpO(2) measurements were found to be useful in selecting the most respondent patients, yielding a 12-month limb salvage up to 83%. Hence, SCS should be considered as a possible treatment option in patients with CLI, particularly if their foot TcpO(2) is between 10 and 30 mmHg.
Similar articles
-
Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD004001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004001. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD004001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004001.pub2. PMID: 12917998 Updated.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD004001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004001.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD004001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004001.pub3. PMID: 16034919 Updated.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials assessing spinal cord stimulation for inoperable critical leg ischaemia.Br J Surg. 2004 Aug;91(8):948-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4629. Br J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15286954
-
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 10;1(1):CD006544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006544.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29318581 Free PMC article.
-
Lumbar sympathectomy versus prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia due to non-reconstructable peripheral arterial disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 16;4(4):CD009366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009366.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29658630 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Chronic Limb Ischemia: A Narrative Review.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Aug 26;11(9):260. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11090260. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 39330318 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic limb ischemia.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013 Apr;9(2):99-102. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-9-2-99. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013. PMID: 23805343 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris -a case report-.Korean J Pain. 2012 Apr;25(2):121-5. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2012.25.2.121. Epub 2012 Apr 4. Korean J Pain. 2012. PMID: 22514782 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable trunk or limb pain: study protocol for a Chinese multicenter randomized withdrawal trial (CITRIP study).Trials. 2020 Oct 7;21(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04768-3. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33028415 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block: an effective alternative technique to control ischaemic severe rest pain during endovascular treatment of critical limb ischaemia.Pol J Radiol. 2019 Dec 13;84:e537-e541. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.91271. eCollection 2019. Pol J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 32082452 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous