Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 May;86(5):710-25.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for temporomandibular disorders

Affiliations
  • PMID: 16649894
Comparative Study

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for temporomandibular disorders

Margaret L McNeely et al. Phys Ther. 2006 May.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The purpose of this qualitative systematic review was to assess the evidence concerning the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in the management of temporomandibular disorders.

Methods: A literature search of published and unpublished articles resulted in the retrieval of 36 potential articles.

Results: Twelve studies met all selection criteria for inclusion in the review: 4 studies addressed the use of therapeutic exercise interventions, 2 studies examined the use of acupuncture, and 6 studies examined electrophysical modalities. Two studies provided evidence in support of postural exercises to reduce pain and to improve function and oral opening. One study provided evidence for the use of manual therapy in combination with active exercises to reduce pain and to improve oral opening. One study provided evidence in support of acupuncture to reduce pain when compared with no treatment; however, in another study no significant differences in pain outcomes were found between acupuncture and sham acupuncture. Significant improvements in oral opening were found with muscular awareness relaxation therapy, biofeedback training, and low-level laser therapy treatment.

Discussion and conclusion: Most of the studies included in this review were of very poor methodological quality; therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

MeSH terms