Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1969 May;44(5):685-90.
doi: 10.1104/pp.44.5.685.

Effects of Phenylmercuric Acetate on Stomatal Movement and Transpiration of Excised Retula papyrifera Marsh. Leaves

Affiliations

Effects of Phenylmercuric Acetate on Stomatal Movement and Transpiration of Excised Retula papyrifera Marsh. Leaves

Y Waisel et al. Plant Physiol. 1969 May.

Abstract

Effects of 10(-3)m, 10(-4)m, and 10(-5)m phenylmercuric acetate (PMA) on stomatal movement and transpiration of excised Betula papyrifera leaves were investigated. Duco cement leaf prints and transpiration decline curves were used for the analysis of stomatal condition. PMA induced stomatal closure and decreased transpiration. Stomata of leaves treated with any of the 3 PMA concentrations closed earlier and at a higher relative water content than did stomata of untreated leaves. As determined from transpiration decline curves, PMA at 10(-3)m caused an increase in apparent "cuticular" transpiration. However, the increase appeared to result largely from some PMA-poisoned stomata which remained open for prolonged periods. Considerable PMA toxicity was observed, with 10(-3)m and 10(-4)m concentrations causing browning of leaves. PMA treatment caused a decrease in chlorophyll content, even at a low PMA concentration (10(-5)m) which influenced stomatal response only slightly and did not cause evident browning of leaves. The time and degree of stomatal opening varied with stomatal size. Large stomata tended to open earlier and close later than small stomata. Hence, in Betula papyrifera stomata of various size classes were considered as physiologically different populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1963 Jul;38(4):390-6 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Sep;47(9):1423-33 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1963 Nov;38(6):713-21 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Apr;57(4):1096-102 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Aug;48(8):1297-9 - PubMed