Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1969 Sep;44(9):1253-9.
doi: 10.1104/pp.44.9.1253.

Regulation of sulfate uptake by amino acids in cultured tobacco cells

Affiliations

Regulation of sulfate uptake by amino acids in cultured tobacco cells

J W Hart et al. Plant Physiol. 1969 Sep.

Abstract

The sulfur requirements of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. var. Xanthi) XD cells grown in chemically defined liquid media can be satisfied by sulfate, thiosulfate, l-cyst(e)ine, l-methionine or glutathione, and somewhat less effectively by d-cyst (e) ine, d-methionine or dl-homocyst (e)ine. Sulfate uptake is inhibited after a 2 hr lag by l-cyst (e)ine, l-methionine, l-homocyst(e)ine or l-isoleucine, but not by any of the other protein amino acids, nor by d-cyst(e)ine. l-cyst(e)ine is neither a competitive nor a non-competitive inhibitor of sulfate uptake. Its action most closely resembles apparent uncompetitive inhibition. Inhibition of sulfate uptake by l-cyst(e)ine can be partially prevented by equimolar l-arginine, l-lysine, l-leucine, l-phenylalanine, l-tyrosine or l-tryptophan, but is little affected by any of the other protein amino acids. The effective amino acids are apparent competitive inhibitors of l-cyst(e)ine uptake after a 2 hr lag. Inhibition of sulfate uptake by l-methionine cannot be prevented, nor can uptake of l-methionine be inhibited by any single protein amino acid. The results suggest the occurrence of negative feedback control of sulfate assimilation by the end products, the sulfur amino acids, in cultured tobacco cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Jun 15;104(1):139-50 - PubMed
    1. Bacteriol Rev. 1965 Dec;29(4):425-41 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Aug;39(1):33-9 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1965 Feb;240:782-7 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966 Apr 19;23(2):220-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources