Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1970 Nov;46(5):692-8.
doi: 10.1104/pp.46.5.692.

Chloroplast composition and structure differences in a soybean mutant

Affiliations

Chloroplast composition and structure differences in a soybean mutant

R W Keck et al. Plant Physiol. 1970 Nov.

Abstract

A nuclear mutation of Glycine max (soybean) segregates 1:2:1 in regard to chlorophyll content. The heterozygous (LG) leaf blade contains about one-half the pigment content of the wild type (DG) per gram fresh weight. A lethal yellow (LY) type contains about 1 to 2% of the DG leaf pigment values. The chlorophyll a/b ratio in the LG is about 5 compared to about 2 in the DG. Protein/leaf values are lower in the LG and LY types when compared to DG. The LG plastid lamellae contain more protein/chlorophyll, cytochromes/chlorophyll, and quinones/chlorophyll than the DG. P(700)/chlorophyll values are similar in the DG and LG types.The chlorophyll-depleted LG and LY types had less total acyl lipids per leaf weight when compared to the DG type. Similar amounts of sulfolipid and phosphatidyl glycerol per protein residue weight were found in the LG and DG plastids; however, the monogalactosyl and digalactosyl diglycerides were reduced in the LG paralleling the chlorophyll depletion.Thin sections of leaf tissue show similar-sized LG and DG plastids but reduced grana formation in the LG. The LY has very few grana and very small grana compared to either DG or LG. The two characteristic particles revealed in higher plant chloroplasts by freeze-etching are about 15% smaller in the LG compared to the DG plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anal Biochem. 1963 Jun;5:531-41 - PubMed
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Oct 10;126(2):189-99 - PubMed
    1. Stain Technol. 1964 Mar;39:111-4 - PubMed
    1. J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):16-31 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1961 Mar 24;4:275-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources