Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 Jun;47(6):745-9.
doi: 10.1104/pp.47.6.745.

Changes in Sterol Composition during Greening of Etiolated Barley Shoots

Affiliations

Changes in Sterol Composition during Greening of Etiolated Barley Shoots

P B Bush et al. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jun.

Abstract

THE FOLLOWING STEROLS WERE IDENTIFIED IN BARLEY SHOOTS: stigmasterol, beta-sitosterol, campesterol, and cholesterol. The total sterol content of green and etiolated tissue was 2.84 and 3.20 milligrams per gram dry weight, respectively. The free sterols accounted for most of the difference in total sterol content. The sterol ester, sterol glycoside, and acylated sterol glycoside contents of green and etiolated barley shoots were essentially the same. Etiolated tissue had twice as much total beta-sitosterol as stigmasterol, while green tissue had equal amounts of these two sterols. The campesterol and cholesterol content was the same in green and etiolated tissue. This same sterol composition pattern held true for the free, glycosidic, and acylated glycosidic sterols; however, the sterol ester fraction had a completely different composition pattern. The esterified stigmasterol content was quite low in green and etiolated tissue, and campesterol was the second largest esterfied sterol component in etiolated tissue. Etiolated barley seedlings exposed to light had a shift in the ratio of free stigmasterol to beta-sitosterol in favor of stigmasterol; however, no correlation was observed between chlorophyll synthesis and shift in sterol composition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Chromatogr. 1969 Oct 14;44(1):173-5 - PubMed
    1. Biochem J. 1968 Nov;110(1):119-25 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Oct;56(4):1095-101 - PubMed
    1. Anal Biochem. 1970 Mar;34:16-23 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1970 Mar;45(3):255-62 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources