Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1980 Nov;66(5):990-5.
doi: 10.1104/pp.66.5.990.

Promotion of sink activity of developing rose shoots by light

Affiliations

Promotion of sink activity of developing rose shoots by light

Y Mor et al. Plant Physiol. 1980 Nov.

Abstract

Holding young rose shoots (Rosa hybrida cv. Marimba) in darkness while the rest of the plant was in light reduced the amount of (14)C assimilates recovered from the darkened shoot by half. Relative specific activity of the shoot tip grown in light was 13.5 times greater than that of the darkened one. The flower bud at the shoot tip degenerated in darkness and died. Shoots 2 to 3 centimeters long, after flower initiation, were most sensitive to the dark treatment. The degeneration is a gradual and reversible process in the first 8 days of darkness, followed by irreversible damage and atrophy. Darkening enhanced the ability of the young leaves to compete for the available assimilates over that of the darkened shoot tip. The enhancement of the mobilizing ability of the shoot tip by light is independent of photosynthesis since spraying with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea or holding shoots in a CO(2)-free atmosphere did not diminish the promoting effect of light on flower bud development or assimilate import. The possibility that light exerts its effect by photoproduction of ATP was also excluded inasmuch as no differences were found in ATP levels of shoot tips held in darkness and those held in light.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1967 Dec;42(12):1743-9 - PubMed
    1. Anal Biochem. 1966 Feb;14(2):261-4 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1978 Sep;62(3):454-7 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1970 Oct;46(4):527-30 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1976 Sep;58(3):320-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources