Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Mar;67(3):484-8.
doi: 10.1104/pp.67.3.484.

Osmoregulation in Cotton in Response to Water Stress : I. ALTERATIONS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF CONDUCTANCE, TRANSLOCATION, AND ULTRASTRUCTURE

Affiliations

Osmoregulation in Cotton in Response to Water Stress : I. ALTERATIONS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF CONDUCTANCE, TRANSLOCATION, AND ULTRASTRUCTURE

R C Ackerson et al. Plant Physiol. 1981 Mar.

Abstract

Cotton plants subjected to a series of water deficits exhibited stress adaptation in the form of osmoregulation when plants were subjected to a subsequent drying cycle. After adaptation, the leaf water potential coinciding with zero turgor was considerably lower than in plants that had never experienced a water stress. The relationship between leaf turgor and leaf water potential depended on leaf age.Nonstomatal factors severely limited photosynthesis in adapted plants at high leaf water potential. Nonetheless, adapted plants maintained photosynthesis to a much lower leaf water potential than did control plants, in part because of increased stomatal conductance at low leaf water potentials. Furthermore, adapted plants continued to translocate recently derived photosynthate to lower leaf water potentials, compared with control plants.Stress preconditioning modified cellular ultrastructure. Chloroplasts of fully turgid adapted leaves contained extremely large starch granules, seemed swollen, and had some breakdown of thylakoid membrane structure. In addition, cells of adapted leaves appeared to have smaller vacuoles and greater nonosmotic cell volume than did control plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1974 Aug;54(2):208-12 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1977 Mar;59(3):348-50 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1976 Apr;57(4):465-8 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):638-40 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1979 Sep;64(3):476-80 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources