Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 May;69(5):1018-22.
doi: 10.1104/pp.69.5.1018.

Leaf conductance as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air

Affiliations

Leaf conductance as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air

M R Kaufmann. Plant Physiol. 1982 May.

Abstract

FOR AN ENTIRE SEASON OF STOMATAL ACTIVITY, LEAF OR NEEDLE CONDUCTANCE WAS OBSERVED ON FOUR SPECIES, EACH IN A DIFFERENT GENUS: Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa [Hook.] Nutt.), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.), and aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). Conductance in the natural environment was described for all species by photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air (DAH), as follows: Conductance = b(1) ( radicalPPFD/ radicalDAH) + b(2) ( radicalPPFD/DAH) + b(3) ( radicalPPFD/DAH(2)). The only data not fitting this relationship were conifer data collected after freezing nights or aspen data collected during a short period in August when water stress occurred. In both cases, leaf conductance was reduced. It is proposed that PPFD and DAH are primary factors controlling stomatal function for plants growing in their native range; secondary factors, such as temperature and water stress, affect conductance intermittently, except when plants are growing outside their normal environmental conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1976 Jun;57(6):898-901 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1980 Jan;65(1):132-5 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1982 May;69(5):1023-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources