Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Jul;70(1):322-5.
doi: 10.1104/pp.70.1.322.

Source-sink relations in maize mutants with starch-deficient endosperms

Affiliations

Source-sink relations in maize mutants with starch-deficient endosperms

K E Koch et al. Plant Physiol. 1982 Jul.

Abstract

Partitioning and translocation of photosynthates were compared between a nonmutant genotype (Oh 43) of corn (Zea mays L.) and two starch-deficient endosperm mutants, shruken-2 (sh2) and brittle-1 (bt1), with similar genetic backgrounds. Steady-state levels of (14)CO(2) were supplied to source leaf blades for 2-hour periods, followed by separation and identification of (14)C-assimilates in the leaf, kernel, and along the translocation path. An average of 14.1% of the total (14)C assimilated was translocated to normal kernels, versus 0.9% in sh2 kernels and 2.6% in btl kernels. Over 98% of the kernel (14)C was in free sugars, and further analysis of nonmutant kernels showed 46% of this label in glucose and fructose. Source leaves of mutant plants exported significantly less total photosynthate (24.0% and 36.3% in sh2 and bt1 compared to 48.0% in the normal plants) and accumulated greater portions of label in the insoluble (starch) fraction. Mutant plants also showed lower percentages of photosynthate in the leaf blade and sheath below the exposed blade area. The starch-deficient endosperm mutants influence the partitioning and translocation of photosynthates and provide a valuable tool for the study of source-sink relations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1968 Aug;43(8):1215-20 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jul;64(1):94-8 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1975 Apr;55(4):704-11 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1974 Aug;54(2):201-7 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1966 Jan 21;151(3708):341-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources