Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Nov;70(5):1508-13.
doi: 10.1104/pp.70.5.1508.

Stomatal behavior and water relations of waterlogged tomato plants

Affiliations

Stomatal behavior and water relations of waterlogged tomato plants

K J Bradford et al. Plant Physiol. 1982 Nov.

Abstract

The effects of waterlogging the soil on leaf water potential, leaf epidermal conductance, transpiration, root conductance to water flow, and petiole epinasty have been examined in the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Stomatal conductance and transpiration are reduced by 30% to 40% after approximately 24 hours of soil flooding. This is not due to a transient water deficit, as leaf water potential is unchanged, even though root conductance is decreased by the stress. The stomatal response apparently prevents any reduction in leaf water potential. Experiments with varied time of flooding, root excision, and stem girdling provide indirect evidence for an influence of roots in maintaining stomatal opening potential. This root-effect cannot be entirely accounted for by alterations in source-sink relationships. Although 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the immediate precursor of ethylene, is transported from the roots to the shoots of waterlogged tomato plants, it has no direct effect on stomatal conductance. Ethylene-induced petiole epinasty develops coincident with partial stomatal closure in waterlogged plants. Leaf epinasty may have beneficial effects on plant water balance by reducing light interception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1980 Jun;65(6):1111-5 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1980 May;65(5):884-7 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1980 Feb;65(2):322-6 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1982 Nov;70(5):1503-7 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1980 Aug;66(2):267-71 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources