Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Apr;71(4):789-96.
doi: 10.1104/pp.71.4.789.

Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity: a comparison of two c(3) and two c(4) grass species

Affiliations

Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity: a comparison of two c(3) and two c(4) grass species

J I Morison et al. Plant Physiol. 1983 Apr.

Abstract

The sensitivity of stomatal conductance to changes of CO(2) concentration and leaf-air vapor pressure difference (VPD) was compared between two C(3) and two C(4) grass species. There was no evidence that stomata of the C(4) species were more sensitive to CO(2) than stomata of the C(3) species. The sensitivity of stomatal conductance to CO(2) change was linearly proportional to the magnitude of stomatal conductance, as determined by the VPD, the same slope fitting the data for all four species. Similarly, the sensitivity of stomatal conductance to VPD was linearly proportional to the magnitude of stomatal conductance. At small VPD, the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO(2) concentration, C(i)/C(a), was similar in all species (0.8-0.9) but declined with increasing VPD, so that, at large VPD, C(i)/C(a) was 0.7 and 0.5 (approximately) in C(3) and C(4) species, respectively. Transpiration efficiency (net CO(2) assimilation rate/transpiration rate) was larger in the C(4) species than in the C(3) species at current atmospheric CO(2) concentrations, but the relative increase due to high CO(2) was larger in the C(3) than in the C(4) species.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1978 Oct;62(4):670-4 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1981 Jan;67(1):115-9 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1981 Jul;68(1):33-40 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1975 Mar;55(3):455-9 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1965 Jan 8;147(3654):171-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources