Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Nov;85(3):786-91.
doi: 10.1104/pp.85.3.786.

Effect of altered sink: source ratio on photosynthetic metabolism of source leaves

Affiliations

Effect of altered sink: source ratio on photosynthetic metabolism of source leaves

Z Plaut et al. Plant Physiol. 1987 Nov.

Abstract

When seven crop species were grown under identical environmental conditions, decreased sink:source ratio led to a decreased photosynthetic rate within 1 to 3 days in Cucumis sativus L., Gossypium hirsutum L., and Raphanus sativus L., but not in Capsicum annuum L., Solanum melongena L., Phaseolus vulgaris L., or Ricinus communis L. The decrease was not associated with stomatal closure. In cotton and cucumber, sink removal led to an increase in starch and sugar content, in glucose 6-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate pools, and in the proportion of (14)C detected in sugar phosphates and UDPglucose following (14)CO(2) supply. When mannose was supplied to leaf discs to sequester cytoplasmic inorganic phosphate, promotion of starch synthesis, and inhibition of CO(2) fixation, were observed in control discs, but not in discs from treated plants. Phosphate buffer reduced starch synthesis in the latter, but not the former discs. The findings suggest that sink removal led to a decreased ratio inorganic phosphate:phosphorylated compounds. In beans (14)C in sugar phosphates increased following sink removal, but without sucrose accumulation, suggesting tighter feedback control of sugar level. Starch accumulated to higher levels than in the other plants, but CO(2) fixation rate was constant for several days.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1984 Oct;76(2):316-20 - PubMed
    1. Anal Biochem. 1968 Feb;22(2):280-3 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1983 Dec;73(4):989-94 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1986 Oct;82(2):555-60 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1979 Aug;64(2):285-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources