Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Feb;98(2):540-5.
doi: 10.1104/pp.98.2.540.

Stomatal response to abscisic Acid is a function of current plant water status

Affiliations

Stomatal response to abscisic Acid is a function of current plant water status

F Tardieu et al. Plant Physiol. 1992 Feb.

Abstract

We investigated, under laboratory and field conditions, the possibility that increasing abscisic acid (ABA) concentrations and decreasing water potentials can interact in their effects on stomata. One experiment was carried out with epidermal pieces of Commelina communis incubated in media with a variety of ABA and polyethylene glycol concentrations. In the media without ABA, incubation in solutions with water potentials between -0.3 and -1.5 megapascals had no significant effect on stomatal aperture. Conversely, the sensitivity of stomatal aperture to ABA was trebled in solutions at -1.5 megapascals compared with sensitivity at -0.3 megapascals. The effect of the change in sensitivity was more important than the absolute effect of ABA at the highest water potential. In a field experiment, sensitivity of maize stomatal conductance to the concentration of ABA in the xylem sap varied strongly with the time of the day. We consider that the most likely explanation for this is the influence of a change in leaf or epidermal water potential that accompanies an increase in irradiance and saturation deficit as the day progresses. These observations suggest that epidermal water relations may act as a modulator of the responses of stomata to ABA. We argue that such changes must be taken into account in studies or modeling of plant responses to drought stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1977;31:471-505 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1990 Aug;93(4):1329-36 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1985 May;78(1):66-70 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1980 Mar;65(3):455-9 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1991 Jan;95(1):171-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources