Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May 3:6:7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-7.

Randomized pilot study to disseminate caries-control services in dentist offices

David Grembowski  1 , Charles Spiekerman, Michael A del Aguila, Maxwell Anderson, Debra Reynolds, Allison Ellersick, James Foster, Leslie Choate
Affiliations

Randomized pilot study to disseminate caries-control services in dentist offices

David Grembowski et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: To determine whether education and financial incentives increased dentists' delivery of fluoride varnish and sealants to at risk children covered by capitation dental insurance in Washington state (U.S.).

Methods: In 1999, 53 dental offices in Washington Dental Service's capitation dental plan were invited to participate in the study, and consenting offices were randomized to intervention (n = 9) and control (n = 10) groups. Offices recruited 689 capitation children aged 6-14 and at risk for caries, who were followed for 2 years. Intervention offices received provider education and fee-for-service reimbursement for delivering fluoride varnish and sealants. Insurance records were used to calculate office service rates for fluoride, sealants, and restorations. Parents completed mail surveys after follow-up to measure their children's dental utilization, dental satisfaction, dental fear and oral health status. Regression models estimated differences in service rates between intervention and control offices, and compared survey measures between groups.

Results: Nineteen offices (34%) consented to participate in the study. Fluoride and sealant rates were greater in the intervention offices than the control offices, but the differences were not statistically significant. Restoration rates were lower in the intervention offices than the control offices. Parents in the intervention group reported their children had less dental fear than control group parents.

Conclusion: Due to low dentist participation the study lacked power to detect an intervention effect on dentists' delivery of caries-control services. The intervention may have reduced children's dental fear.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson MH, Bales DJ, Omnell KA. Modern management of dental caries: the cutting edge is not the dental bur. JADA. 1993;124:37–44. - PubMed
    1. Anusavice KJ. Treatment regimens in preventive and restorative dentistry. JADA. 1995;126:727–43. - PubMed
    1. Fiset L, Grembowski D. Adoption of innovative caries-control services in dental practice: a survey of Washington state dentists. JADA. 1997;128:337–45. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service . Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-50211; 1991.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000.

LinkOut - more resources