Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Winter;22(1):76-83.
doi: 10.1017/s0266462306050860.

Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints

Jacques J X R Geraets  1 , Mariëlle E J B Goossens, Camiel P C de Bruijn, Imelda J M de Groot, Albère J S Köke, Rob A G B Pelt, Geert Van der Heijden, Geert-Jan Dinant, Wim J A van den Heuvel
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints

Jacques J X R Geraets et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Winter.

Abstract

Objectives: The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral graded exercise therapy (GET) program compared with usual care (UC) in terms of the performance of daily activities by patients with chronic shoulder complaints in primary care.

Methods: A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned either to GET (n=87) or to UC (n=89). Clinical outcomes (main complaints, shoulder disability [SDQ] and generic health-related quality of life [EQ-5D], and costs [intervention costs, direct health care costs, direct non-health-related costs, and indirect costs]) were assessed during the 12-week treatment period and at 52 weeks of follow-up.

Results: Results showed that GET was more effective than UC in restoring daily activities as assessed by the main complaints instrument after the 12-week treatment period (p = .049; mean difference, 7.5; confidence interval [CI], 0.0-15.0). These effects lasted for at least 52 weeks (p = .025; mean difference 9.2; CI, 1.2-17.3). No statistically significant differences were found on the SDQ or EQ5D. GET significantly reduced direct health care costs (p = .000) and direct non-health care costs (p = .029). Nevertheless, total costs during the 1-year follow-up period were significantly higher (p = .001; GET = Euro 530 versus UC = Euro 377) due to the higher costs of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the main complaints (0-100), SDQ (0-100), and EQ-5D (-1.0-1.0) were Euro 7, Euro 74, and Euro 5278 per unit of improvement, respectively.

Conclusions: GET proved to be more effective in the short- and long-term and reduces direct health care costs and direct non-health care costs but is associated with higher costs of the intervention itself.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types