Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May 4:6:6.
doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-6-6.

Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study

Affiliations

Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study

Jakob L Forberg et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the Emergency Department (ED), but the cost of ED chest pain patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the direct hospital costs for unselected chest pain patients attending the emergency department (ED).

Methods: 1,000 consecutive ED visits of patients with chest pain were retrospectively included. Costs directly following the ED visit were retrieved from the hospital economy system.

Results: The mean cost per patient visit was 26.8 thousand Swedish kronar (kSEK) (median 7.2 kSEK), with admission time accounting for 73% of all costs. Mean cost for patients discharged from the ED was 1.4 kSEK (median 1.3 kSEK), and for patients without ACS admitted 1 day or less 7.6 kSEK (median 6.9 kSEK). The practice in the present study to admit 67% of the patients, of whom only 31% proved to have ACS, was estimated to give a cost per additional life-year saved by hospital admission, compared to theoretical strategy of discharging all patients home, of about 350 kSEK (39 kEUR or 42 kUSD).

Conclusion: Costs for chest pain patients are large and primarily due to admission time. The present admission practice seems to be cost-effective, but the substantial overadmission indicates that better ED diagnostics and triage could decrease costs considerably.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the composition of total costs for all patients (left bar), and patients without ACS admitted for one day or less (right bar).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total cost per visit in relation to ED triage to discharge (right bars) and admission to different hospital units. N = number of patient visits in each group. Two patients that died in the ED are not included.

References

    1. Ekelund U, Nilsson HJ, Frigyesi A, Torffvit O. Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in a university hospital emergency department: an observational study. BMC Emerg Med. 2002;2:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-2-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tosteson AN, Goldman L, Udvarhelyi IS, Lee TH. Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain. Circulation. 1996;94:143–50. - PubMed
    1. Goodacre S, Calvert N. Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:429–33. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.5.429. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodacre S, Nicholl J, Dixon S, Cross E, Angelini K, Arnold J, Revill S, Locker T, Capewell SJ, Quinney D, et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care. Bmj. 2004;328:254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37956.664236.EE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wears RL, Li S, Hernandez JD, Luten RC, Vukich DJ. How many myocardial infarctions should we rule out? Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:953–63. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(89)80460-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources