Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Oct;65(2):97-114.
doi: 10.1007/s11230-006-9041-y. Epub 2006 May 5.

Morphological and genetic differences among actinosporean stages of fish-parasitic myxosporeans (Myxozoa): difficulties of species identification

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Morphological and genetic differences among actinosporean stages of fish-parasitic myxosporeans (Myxozoa): difficulties of species identification

Edit Eszterbauer et al. Syst Parasitol. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

The occurrence and morphology of actinosporean stages of myxosporeans were studied at a fish farm and in the River Tisza in Hungary. The 43 samples sequenced belonged to 10 'genotypes', from which six were determined as new actinosporean types. Based on DNA sequence analysis, the assumed actinosporean developmental stages of four myxozoan species were identified. The raabeia type collected from the worm Branchiura sowerbyi was identified as Myxobolus cultus Yokoyama, Ogawa & Wakabyashi, 1995. This was the first occurrence of this parasite in Hungary. Aurantiactinomyxon type 'A' was assigned as a developmental stage of Thelohanellus hovorkai Achmerov, 1964, triactinomyxon type 'D' was identified as Myxobolus sp. from the fins of roach Rutilus rutilus, while the DNA sequence of the guyenotia type actinosporean was 99.9-100% identical with Sphaerospora sp. from the kidney tubules of goldfish Carassius auratus auratus. Partial 18S rDNA sequences of the myxosporeans Thelohanellus hovorkai, T. nikolskii Achmerov, 1955 and Myxobolus sp. from Rutilus rutilus were new additions to GenBank. The DNA sequence analysis revealed that, in the case of actinosporeans, different 'morphotypes' can belong to the same 'genotype'. This study confirmed that actinospore classification based solely on traditional morphological features may lead to false conclusions, thus sequence analysis of the 18S rDNA and/or other genes is recommended in species and type descriptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Nov 25;16(22):10881-90 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1984 Sep 28;225(4669):1449-52 - PubMed
    1. Dis Aquat Organ. 2005 Aug 9;66(1):9-14 - PubMed
    1. Int J Parasitol. 2004 Sep;34(10):1099-111 - PubMed
    1. J Parasitol. 1998 Oct;84(5):1020-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources