Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 May;129(5):631-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.020.

A prospective long-term study on the effects of rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A prospective long-term study on the effects of rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition

Renée G Geran et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this prospective longitudinal clinical study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term changes in dental-arch dimensions in patients treated with the acrylic splint rapid maxillary expander in the early mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances in the permanent dentition.

Methods: The dental casts of 51 consecutively treated patients (TG) were compared with those of 26 untreated controls (CG) at 3 different times: pretreatment (T1), after expansion and fixed appliance therapy (T2), and at long-term observation (T3). The mean ages for the TG were 8 years 10 months at T1, 13 years 10 months at T2, and 19 years 9 months at T3. Arch widths, arch depth, arch perimeter, and molar angulation were assessed in all subjects at all observation times. T1-T2, T2-T3, and T1-T3 changes were compared statistically in the TG with respect to the corresponding CG.

Results: Treatment with an acrylic splint RME followed by fixed appliances produced significantly favorable short-term and long-term changes in almost all maxillary and mandibular arch measurements. The amount of change in both maxillary and mandibular intermolar and intercanine widths fully corrected the initial discrepancies. Approximately 4 mm of long-term relative increase in maxillary arch perimeter, and 2.5 mm additional maintenance of mandibular arch perimeter were observed in the TG compared with the CG.

Conclusions: These results suggest that this protocol is effective and stable for the treatment of constricted maxillary arches, and can relieve modest deficiencies in arch perimeter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources