Influence of buccal segment size on prevention of side effects from incisor intrusion
- PMID: 16679206
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.039
Influence of buccal segment size on prevention of side effects from incisor intrusion
Abstract
Introduction: Deep overbite can be corrected by maxillary incisor intrusion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the size of the maxillary buccal segment influences the amount of steepening, extrusion, or narrowing of the buccal segments, or the rate of intrusion that occurs with maxillary incisor intrusion.
Methods: Twenty patients, 9 to 14 years of age, seeking treatment at a private practice, were divided into 2 groups. Patients in the long buccal-segment group had maxillary buccal segments that included the canines, both premolars, and the first molars. In the short buccal-segment group, the buccal segments consisted of only the maxillary first molars. Patient records were taken at the beginning and end of maxillary incisor intrusion.
Results: Intermolar width increased slightly in the short buccal-segment group and decreased slightly in the long buccal-segment group. More steepening of the buccal segment occurred in the short buccal-segment group, and more proclination of the anterior segment in the long buccal-segment group. The size of the buccal segment had no influence on the rate of incisor intrusion or on the amount of buccal-segment extrusion. In both groups, the mean amount of incisor intrusion exceeded 2 mm.
Conclusions: A buccal segment that extends from canine to first molar will help minimize the side effects of incisor intrusion.
Similar articles
-
The role of a high pull headgear in counteracting side effects from intrusion of the maxillary anterior segment.Angle Orthod. 2004 Aug;74(4):480-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0480:TROAHP>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2004. PMID: 15387025
-
The influence of force magnitude on intrusion of the maxillary segment.Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):723-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[723:TIOFMO]2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2005. PMID: 16283812 Clinical Trial.
-
The relation between the point of force application and flaring of the anterior segment.Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):730-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[730:TRBTPO]2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2005. PMID: 16279820
-
Intrusion of maxillary incisors by mini-screw anchorage of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion cases.Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2012 Winter;23(4):29-35. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2012. PMID: 23413639
-
Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.021. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23561415
Cited by
-
Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: Root resorption and treatment efficiency.Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):746-52. doi: 10.2319/085015-571.1. Epub 2016 Jan 7. Angle Orthod. 2016. PMID: 26741306 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Effect of Miniscrew-Supported and Conventional Maxillary Incisor Intrusion on the Inclination of Maxillary Incisors and Molars - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):307-314. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_385_22. Epub 2022 Dec 1. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022. PMID: 36686998 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion.Korean J Orthod. 2017 May;47(3):167-175. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167. Epub 2017 Mar 13. Korean J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28523243 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources