Assessment of risk-independent follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer
- PMID: 16680479
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-006-0045-5
Assessment of risk-independent follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer
Abstract
Background and aims: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. We analyzed the value of standardized, risk-independent postoperative surveillance.
Materials and methods: Between 1995 and 2001, 564 patients with colorectal cancer underwent standardized oncologic resection. One hundred thirty-four were unable to take part in the surveillance program, while 430 patients were grouped as follows: group I (n=272, risk-independent follow-up), group II (n=113, follow-up at other departments), and group III (n=45, no follow-up).
Results: The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate for UICC III and IV was significantly higher in group I (87%) as compared to group II (35%). In group I, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70%. Cancer recurrence occurred at mean 17 (+/-12) months after colorectal resection and yielded a 5-year survival rate of 63%. Reresection was performed in 17 (35%) patients, of whom ten remained disease-free (5-year survival rate, 91%). The money spent for one patient's 5-year follow-up was 1665.
Conclusions: A standardized, risk-independent follow-up program allows early diagnosis of asymptomatic recurrence of colorectal cancer. Reresection improves the 5-year survival rate in this setting.
Similar articles
-
Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients.World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul 4;5:73. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-73. World J Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17610720 Free PMC article.
-
[Effect of postoperative complications on late recurrence and distant metastasis in patients previously treated with elective, curative resection of colorectal carcinoma].Magy Seb. 2011 Apr;64(2):74-81. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.64.2011.2.4. Magy Seb. 2011. PMID: 21504856 Hungarian.
-
Colonoscopic surveillance after curative colorectal resection: results of an empirical surveillance programme.Colorectal Dis. 2003 May;5(3):233-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00412.x. Colorectal Dis. 2003. PMID: 12780884
-
Major postoperative complications following elective resection for colorectal cancer decrease long-term survival but not the time to recurrence.Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):141-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12757. Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25156234
-
Optimal Surveillance Protocols After Curative Resection in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jan;61(1):51-57. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000950. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018. PMID: 29215480
Cited by
-
Is limited surgery justified in the treatment of T1 colorectal cancer?Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):817-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2518-7. Epub 2012 Dec 12. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23232987
-
Long-term surveillance of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and aggressive surgical treatment of recurrent disease: a consecutive single-centre experience.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Dec;30(12):1705-14. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2366-8. Epub 2015 Aug 21. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 26293791
-
Therapeutic management and outcome of locoregional recurrence after curative colorectal cancer therapy-a single-center analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):2026-33. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2633-y. Epub 2014 Aug 27. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 25159503
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical