Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 May 8:5:37.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-37.

Costing the distribution of insecticide-treated nets: a review of cost and cost-effectiveness studies to provide guidance on standardization of costing methodology

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Costing the distribution of insecticide-treated nets: a review of cost and cost-effectiveness studies to provide guidance on standardization of costing methodology

Jan Kolaczinski et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are an effective and cost-effective means of malaria control. Scaling-up coverage of ITNs is challenging. It requires substantial resources and there are a number of strategies to choose from. Information on the cost of different strategies is still scarce. To guide the choice of a delivery strategy (or combination of strategies), reliable and standardized cost information for the different options is required.

Methods: The electronic online database PubMed was used for a systematic search of the published English literature on costing and economic evaluations of ITN distribution programmes. The keywords used were: net, bednet, insecticide, treated, ITN, cost, effectiveness, economic and evaluation. Identified papers were analysed to determine and evaluate the costing methods used. Methods were judged against existing standards of cost analysis to arrive at proposed standards for undertaking and presenting cost analyses.

Results: Cost estimates were often not readily comparable or could not be adjusted to a different context. This resulted from the wide range of methods applied and measures of output chosen. Most common shortcomings were the omission of certain costs and failure to adjust financial costs to generate economic costs. Generalisability was hampered by authors not reporting quantities and prices of resources separately and not examining the sensitivity of their results to variations in underlying assumptions.

Conclusion: The observed shortcomings have arisen despite the abundance of literature and guidelines on costing of health care interventions. This paper provides ITN specific recommendations in the hope that these will help to standardize future cost estimates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lengeler C. Insecticide treated bednets and curtains for malaria control (Cochrane Review) Oxford: The Cochrane Library; 2005. - PubMed
    1. Reyburn H, Ashford R, Mohsen M, Hewitt S, Rowland M. A randomized controlled trial of insecticide-treated bednets and chaddars or top sheets, and residual spraying of interior rooms for the prevention of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kabul, Afghanistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:361–366. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90104-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodman C, Coleman P, Mills A. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. 1999;354:378–385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02141-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiseman V, Hawley W, Ter Kuile F, Phillips-Howard P, Vulule J, Nahlen B, Mills A. The cost-effectiveness of permethrin-treated bed nets in an area of intense malaria transmission in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:161–167. - PubMed
    1. Hanson K, Kikumbih N, Armstrong-Schellenberg J, Mponda H, Nathan R, Lake S, Mills A, Tanner M, Lengeler C. Cost-effectiveness of social marketing of insecticide-treated nets for malaria control in the United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:269–276. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources