Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 May 20;332(7551):1189-94.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38796.457407.80. Epub 2006 May 8.

HIV prevention in Mexican schools: prospective randomised evaluation of intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

HIV prevention in Mexican schools: prospective randomised evaluation of intervention

Dilys Walker et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess effects on condom use and other sexual behaviour of an HIV prevention programme at school that promotes the use of condoms with and without emergency contraception.

Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 40 public high schools in the state of Morelos, Mexico.

Participants: 10 954 first year high school students.

Intervention: Schools were randomised to one of three arms: an HIV prevention course that promoted condom use, the same course with emergency contraception as back-up, or the existing sex education course. Self administered anonymous questionnaires were completed at baseline, four months, and 16 months. Students at intervention schools received a 30 hour course (over 15 weeks) on HIV prevention and life skills, designed in accordance with guidelines of the joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS. Two extra hours of education on emergency contraception were given to students in the condom promotion with contraception arm.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measure was reported condom use. Other outcomes were reported sexual activity; knowledge and attitudes about HIV and emergency contraception; and attitudes and confidence about condom use.

Results: Intervention did not affect reported condom use. Knowledge of HIV improved in both intervention arms and knowledge of emergency contraception improved in the condom promotion with contraception arm. Reported sexual behaviour was similar in the intervention arms and the control group.

Conclusion: A rigorously designed, implemented, and evaluated HIV education course based in public high schools did not reduce risk behaviour, so such courses need to be redesigned and evaluated. Addition of emergency contraception did not decrease reported condom use or increase risky sexual behaviour but did increase reported use of emergency contraception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. DiCenso A, Grodon G, Willan A, Griffith L. Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2002;324: 1-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magnussen L, Ehiri JE, Ejeri H, Jolly PE. Interventions to prevent HIV/AIDS among adolescents in developing countries: are they effective? Int J Adolesc Med Health 2004,16: 303-23. - PubMed
    1. Kirby D. A review of educational programs designed to reduce sexual risk-taking behaviors among school-aged youth in the United States. Springfield, Virginia: National Technical Information Service, 1995.
    1. Kirby D. Effective approaches to reducing adolescent unprotected sex, pregnancy and childbearing. J Sex Res 2002;39: 51-7. - PubMed
    1. Oakley A, Fullerton D, Holland H, Arnold S, France-Dawson M, Kelley P, et al. Sexual health education: intervention for young people: a methodological review. BMJ 1995;310: 158-62. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances