Interpreting disparate responses to cancer therapy: the role of human population genetics
- PMID: 16682733
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2282
Interpreting disparate responses to cancer therapy: the role of human population genetics
Abstract
Increasingly, investigators are recognizing differences in tumor biology, drug metabolism, toxicity, and therapeutic response among different patient populations receiving anticancer agents. These observations provide exciting opportunities to identify the factors most important for predicting individual variability in pharmacologically relevant phenotypes and consequently for personalizing the delivery of cancer therapy. Although pharmacogenomic differences may explain some of these disparities, rigorous investigation of both genetic and nongenetic differences is important to identify the variables most important for optimal selection and dosing of treatment for an individual patient. For example, pharmacogenetic tests currently used in cancer therapy, such as genotyping UGT1A1 to reduce the incidence of severe toxicity of irinotecan and sequencing epidermal growth factor receptor from tumors to identify somatic mutations conferring sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, were developed without initial identification of interpopulation differences. Although interpopulation variability in toxicity and efficacy of these agents has been observed, the basis for these population differences remains only partially explained. Here, we review concepts of human population genetics to inform interpretations of disparate drug effects of cancer therapy across patient populations. Understanding these principles will help investigators better design clinical trials to identify the variables most relevant to subsequent individualization of a cancer therapy.
Similar articles
-
[Pharmacogenetics of anticancer drugs].Pathol Biol (Paris). 2005 Mar;53(2):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2004.05.001. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2005. PMID: 15708657 Review. French.
-
Genetic tests for predicting the toxicity and efficacy of anticancer chemotherapy.Neoplasma. 2007;54(3):181-8. Neoplasma. 2007. PMID: 17447847 Review.
-
Somatic pharmacogenomics in cancer.Pharmacogenomics J. 2008 Oct;8(5):305-14. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2008.8. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Pharmacogenomics J. 2008. PMID: 18679398 Review.
-
Pharmacogenetics for individualized cancer chemotherapy.Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug;107(2):155-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.02.005. Pharmacol Ther. 2005. PMID: 15890408 Review.
-
Cancer pharmacogenomics: powerful tools in cancer chemotherapy and drug development.Oncologist. 2005 Feb;10(2):104-11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-2-104. Oncologist. 2005. PMID: 15709212 Review.
Cited by
-
Human genomic diversity, viral genomics and proteomics, as exemplified by human papillomaviruses and H5N1 influenza viruses.Hum Genomics. 2009 Jul;3(4):320-31. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-3-4-320. Hum Genomics. 2009. PMID: 19706363 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic.PLoS Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):e209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040209. PLoS Med. 2007. PMID: 17696640 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving the oral bioavailability of beneficial polyphenols through designed synergies.Genes Nutr. 2010 Mar;5(1):75-87. doi: 10.1007/s12263-009-0148-z. Epub 2009 Oct 20. Genes Nutr. 2010. PMID: 19841960 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.World J Urol. 2006 Nov;24(5):531-42. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0113-z. World J Urol. 2006. PMID: 17115230 Review.
-
Microfluidic Biopsy Trapping Device for the Real-Time Monitoring of Tumor Microenvironment.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169797. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28085924 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials