Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;34(10):1604-14.
doi: 10.1177/0363546506288015. Epub 2006 May 9.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up

Affiliations

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up

Lucy J Salmon et al. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The results of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are limited in the current literature, and no studies have previously documented the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using solely hamstring tendon grafts.

Hypothesis: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon graft affords acceptable results and is comparable to reported outcomes with the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with the hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation were assessed a mean time of 89 months (range, 60-109 months) after surgery. Assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee knee ligament evaluation, instrumented laxity testing, and radiologic examination.

Results: Of the 50 knees reviewed, 5 (10%) had objective failure of the revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Of the 45 patients with functional grafts, knee function was normal or nearly normal in 33 patients (73%). An overall grade of normal or nearly normal was found in 56% of patients. The mean side-to-side difference on manual maximum testing was 2.5 mm (range, -1 to 4 mm). Degenerative changes on radiographs were identified in 23% of patients at the time of surgery, increasing to 56% of patients at review. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of revision surgery was the most significant contributor to successful outcome.

Conclusion: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation affords acceptable results at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Good objective results can be obtained, but subjectively, the results appear inferior to those of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the literature, which may be related to the high incidence of articular surface damage in this patient population. We recommend that, when available, hamstring tendon autografts should be considered for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions.
    Gifstad T, Drogset JO, Viset A, Grøntvedt T, Hortemo GS. Gifstad T, et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2011-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2336-4. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 23238924
  • Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    MARS Group; Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Lantz BBA, Mann B, Nwosu SK, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Wright RW, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR Jr, Baker CL 3rd, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler JB 5th, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ Jr, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL Jr, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Hosea TM, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP 2nd, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda SJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS Jr, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. MARS Group, et al. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2586-2594. doi: 10.1177/0363546517712952. Epub 2017 Jul 11. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28696164 Free PMC article.
  • Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allografts in patients younger than 40 years old: a 2 to 4 year results.
    Pascual-Garrido C, Carbo L, Makino A. Pascual-Garrido C, et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1106-11. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2507-y. Epub 2013 Apr 24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMID: 23612778
  • Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.
    Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, Tsepis E, Werner S, Wondrasch B, Witvrouw E. Thomeé R, et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1798-805. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1669-8. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. PMID: 21932078 Review.
  • Combined Intra- and Extra-Articular Technique in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Zanovello J, Rosso F, Bistolfi A, Rossi R, Castoldi F. Zanovello J, et al. Joints. 2017 Aug 11;5(3):156-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605590. eCollection 2017 Sep. Joints. 2017. PMID: 29270546 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources