Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up
- PMID: 16685086
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546506288015
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up
Abstract
Background: The results of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are limited in the current literature, and no studies have previously documented the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using solely hamstring tendon grafts.
Hypothesis: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon graft affords acceptable results and is comparable to reported outcomes with the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with the hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation were assessed a mean time of 89 months (range, 60-109 months) after surgery. Assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee knee ligament evaluation, instrumented laxity testing, and radiologic examination.
Results: Of the 50 knees reviewed, 5 (10%) had objective failure of the revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Of the 45 patients with functional grafts, knee function was normal or nearly normal in 33 patients (73%). An overall grade of normal or nearly normal was found in 56% of patients. The mean side-to-side difference on manual maximum testing was 2.5 mm (range, -1 to 4 mm). Degenerative changes on radiographs were identified in 23% of patients at the time of surgery, increasing to 56% of patients at review. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of revision surgery was the most significant contributor to successful outcome.
Conclusion: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation affords acceptable results at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Good objective results can be obtained, but subjectively, the results appear inferior to those of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the literature, which may be related to the high incidence of articular surface damage in this patient population. We recommend that, when available, hamstring tendon autografts should be considered for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1327-36. doi: 10.1177/0363546504273488. Epub 2005 Jul 7. Am J Sports Med. 2005. PMID: 16002490
-
Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods.Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):1946-57. doi: 10.1177/0363546509339577. Epub 2009 Aug 14. Am J Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19684298 Clinical Trial.
-
Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study.Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1430-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546511400384. Epub 2011 Mar 25. Am J Sports Med. 2011. PMID: 21441418 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):51-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02805. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005. PMID: 15743847 Review.
-
Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? a meta-analysis of 32 studies.Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):714-723. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0929.R2. Bone Joint J. 2017. PMID: 28566389 Review.
Cited by
-
Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2011-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2336-4. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 23238924
-
Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2586-2594. doi: 10.1177/0363546517712952. Epub 2017 Jul 11. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28696164 Free PMC article.
-
Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allografts in patients younger than 40 years old: a 2 to 4 year results.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1106-11. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2507-y. Epub 2013 Apr 24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMID: 23612778
-
Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1798-805. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1669-8. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. PMID: 21932078 Review.
-
Combined Intra- and Extra-Articular Technique in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Joints. 2017 Aug 11;5(3):156-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605590. eCollection 2017 Sep. Joints. 2017. PMID: 29270546 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical