Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice
- PMID: 16687908
Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice
Abstract
Class II division 1 malocclusion represents the most common skeletal discrepancy which orthodontists see in daily practice. The understanding of the morphology is a key element in planning dentofacial orthopedic treatment for this type of malocclusion. The purpose of the present study was to examine prepubertal children with Class II division 1 malocclusion and to evaluate maxillary and mandibular skeletal positions in comparison with normal growth standards by means of cephalometric measurements used by clinical practitioners. For the study casts and cephalograms of 86 consecutive patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion were used. The Class II division 1 malocclusion demonstrates broad variation in its skeletal and dental morphology. The retrognathic mandible (60%), maxillary prognathism (55.8%) and reduce vertical skeletal jaw relationship is the most common characteristic of Class II division 1 malocclusion. The optimal correction of the anteroposterior and vertical dental and skeletal discrepancies could be designed on the base of individual diagnosis for every Class II division 1 patient.
Similar articles
-
The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2011 Fall;22(3):31-9. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2011. PMID: 22031992
-
Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.J Investig Clin Dent. 2011 May;2(2):135-43. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00042.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5. J Investig Clin Dent. 2011. PMID: 25426607
-
Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.Br Dent J. 1999 Feb 27;186(4 Spec No):188-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800059. Br Dent J. 1999. PMID: 10205956
-
Early developmental traits in class II malocclusion.Acta Odontol Scand. 1998 Dec;56(6):375-7. doi: 10.1080/000163598428356. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998. PMID: 10066120 Review.
-
[The orthopedic effect of the Edgewise technic].Orthod Fr. 1992;63 Pt 2:469-89. Orthod Fr. 1992. PMID: 1341733 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Re: Mandibular growth comparisons of Class I and Class II division 1 skeletofacial patterns by Helder B. Jacob, Peter H. Buschang. The Angle Orthod. 2014;84:755-761.Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):538. doi: 10.2319/angl-85-03-538-538.1. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25955604 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):63-72. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.063-072.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31508708 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between vertical components and skeletal Class II malocclusion in ethnic Javanese.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Dec 19;10:297-302. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S188414. eCollection 2018. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018. PMID: 30588125 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 appliance on cephalometric indices in patients with Class II division 1 versus division 2 malocclusions: A preliminary before-after clinical trial.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 May 24;18:38. eCollection 2021. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021. PMID: 34322214 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation Between Horizontal and Vertical Skeletal Components in Dental Malocclusions Among the Jazan Population.Cureus. 2023 Nov 1;15(11):e48087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48087. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38054125 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources