Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 May;15(4):739-54.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-4184-x.

Characteristics of health-related self-report measures for children aged three to eight years: a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Characteristics of health-related self-report measures for children aged three to eight years: a review of the literature

Joanne Cremeens et al. Qual Life Res. 2006 May.

Abstract

Aims: To review and make recommendations about the format and quality of health-related self-report measures for children aged 3-8 years.

Methods: Literature searches used to identify measures of QOL, self-esteem, self-concept and mental health. The format (i.e., scale type, presentation style) and quality (i.e., item generation, reliability, validity, responsiveness) of measures were compared and evaluated.

Results: Fifty three measures were identified: QOL (n = 25, 47%), self-esteem/concept (n = 15, 28%), mental health (n = 13, 25%). Likert scales were used most frequently to represent response choices (n = 34, 64%). The authors of 11 (21%) measures provided justification for their scale choice. Items were most commonly presented in written format (n = 24, 45%). Item content was generated from the respondent population in only 21 (40%) measures. Twenty-seven (51%) measures reported internal reliability between 0.70 and 0.90, and 12 (23%) reported reproducibility in this range. Although validity was reported for 48 (91%) measures, evidence for three or more aspects occurred for only 9 (17%). Eleven (21%) measures evidenced responsiveness to change.

Conclusion: Authors should provide clearer evidence for reliability and responsiveness. Newly developed instruments need to meet established standards, and further studies should assess the impact of scale and presentation types on the psychometrics of measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Psychol. 1988 Jul;44(4):477-90 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Dec;16(6):605-25 - PubMed
    1. J Public Health Med. 1996 Jun;18(2):197-206 - PubMed
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Feb;101(2 Pt 1):163-70 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1403-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources