Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Jun;125(6):921-7.
doi: 10.1309/NBA3-12W0-LANR-XYH9.

Performance characteristics of seven automated CA 125 assays

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance characteristics of seven automated CA 125 assays

Shella K Mongia et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) is a high-molecular-mass glycoprotein that is used as a tumor marker to monitor disease progression and response to therapy and in early detection of recurrence after treatment for ovarian cancer. The Access 2 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA), ADVIA Centaur (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), ARCHITECT i2000 (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL), AxSYM (Abbott Diagnostics), Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), IMMULITE 2000 (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA), and VITROS ECi (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) assays for CA 125 were evaluated for detection limit, dilution linearity, imprecision, correlation, and reference intervals. The maximum average deviation from target recoveries for dilution linearity studies ranged from 3.7% for the ADVIA Centaur to 18.2% for the IMMULITE 2000. Imprecision studies yielded total coefficients of variation of 2.0% to 8.3% at CA 125 concentrations of 35 and 114 U/mL (35 and 114 kU/L). Method comparison studies revealed good agreement with the VITROS ECi comparison method, with slopes ranging between 0.88 to 1.19 and correlation coefficients of more than 0.95. All methods show acceptable performance characteristics and generally compare well. However, for some samples, substantial differences exist between methods, necessitating parallel testing when introducing a new method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types