Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Jun;1(2):85-8.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laser versus electrosurgery

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1669388
Clinical Trial

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laser versus electrosurgery

J D Corbitt Jr. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun.

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been reported to be a safe and effective way to remove a diseased gallbladder with essentially no morbidity or mortality (1,2). This procedure was first introduced in Europe using electrosurgery, and later introduced in the United States using the laser (1). No clinical trial compares the laser to the standard electrosurgery method. In a review, as well as an ongoing study, morbidity, mortality, intraoperative procedures, indications, and cost effectiveness are considered in these two groups. Three hundred cases were reviewed with 150 patients in each group. There were no deaths or significant complications in either group. In the laser group, bleeding seemed slightly more excessive during removal of the gallbladder from the liver bed and required more time to control. The electrosurgery group required slightly less operative time and was less costly. The postoperative recovery time was the same in each group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources