Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing
- PMID: 16697308
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.056
Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, the safety, and hemodynamic improvements induced by permanent para-Hisian pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS who underwent atrioventricular (AV) node ablation.
Background: Right ventricular apical pacing, inducing asynchronous ventricular contraction, may impair cardiac function; permanent para-Hisian pacing could preserve interventricular synchrony and improve left ventricular function.
Methods: After AV node ablation, 16 patients were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker connected to a screw-in lead positioned in close proximity to the His bundle and to a right ventricular apical lead. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and after two randomized six-month periods (with para-Hisian and conventional pacing).
Results: During para-Hisian pacing, the interventricular electromechanical delay improved as well (34 +/- 18 ms) as during right apical pacing (47 +/- 19 ms), p < 0.05. Para-Hisian pacing allowed an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (1.75 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.6 at baseline and 2.5 +/- 0.4 during apical pacing, p < 0.05 for both), in quality-of-life score (16.2 +/- 8.7 vs. 32.5 +/- 15.0 at baseline, p < 0.05), and in the 6-min walk test (431 +/- 73 m vs. 378 +/- 60 m at baseline and 360 +/- 71 m during apical pacing, p < 0.5 for both). Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation improved during para-Hisian pacing (1.22 +/- 0.8 and 1.46 +/- 0.5 index, respectively, vs. 1.68 +/- 0.6 [p < 0.05] and 1.62 +/- 0.7 [p = NS] index at baseline, respectively), with a slight worsening during apical pacing (1.93 +/- 1 and 1.93 +/- 0.7 index, respectively, p < 0.05 for both).
Conclusions: Permanent para-Hisian pacing is feasible and safe. Compared with conventional right apical pacing, it allows an improvement in functional and hemodynamic parameters over long-term follow-up.
Comment in
-
Alternative site pacing to promote cardiac synchrony: has conventional pacing become unconventional?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 16;47(10):1946-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Apr 24. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16697309 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of upgrading to biventricular pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing and congestive heart failure after atrioventricular junctional ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.Europace. 2004 Sep;6(5):438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.04.004. Europace. 2004. PMID: 15294269 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;17(3):238-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00358.x. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16643392 Clinical Trial.
-
Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study).J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Nov;16(11):1160-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.50062.x. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16302897 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of permanent left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: a prospective hemodynamic study.Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec;7(4):315-24. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023167.11038.8f. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003. PMID: 15071245 Review.
-
Physiologic pacing: new modalities and pacing sites.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Dec;29 Suppl 2:S73-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00493.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006. PMID: 17169136 Review.
Cited by
-
Conversion to Sinus Rhythm in Refractory Atrial Fibrillation Patients after Atrioventricular Node Ablation with Conduction System Pacing.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 24;24(11):333. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2411333. eCollection 2023 Nov. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39076439 Free PMC article.
-
A case of supraventricular tachycardia misdiagnosis after dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation with His bundle pacing.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023 May;28(3):e13042. doi: 10.1111/anec.13042. Epub 2023 Jan 13. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023. PMID: 36639840 Free PMC article.
-
Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Aug;24(8):959-978. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01723-3. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35678938 Review.
-
[Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008 Dec;19 Suppl 1:25-37. doi: 10.1007/s00399-008-0604-2. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008. PMID: 19169732 Review. German.
-
Paced QRS axis as a predictor of pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;41(3):223-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9950-7. Epub 2014 Nov 8. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25380704
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous