Editorial
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00629-X.
A new classification is needed for pelvic pain syndromes--are existing terminologies of spurious diagnostic authority bad for patients?
- PMID: 16697782
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00629-X
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
A new classification is needed for pelvic pain syndromes--are existing terminologies of spurious diagnostic authority bad for patients?
J Urol.
2006 Jun.
No abstract available
Comment in
-
Re: A new classification is needed for pelvic pain syndromes--are existing terminologies of spurious diagnostic authority bad for patients? P. Abrams, A. Baranowski, R. E. Berger, M. Fall, P. Hanno and U. Wesselmann, J Urol, 175: 1989-1990, 2006.J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2748-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.037. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 17085216 No abstract available.
-
Re: a new classification is needed for pelvic pain syndromes--are existing terminologies of spurious diagnostic authority bad for patients? P. Abrams, A. Baranowski, R. E. Berger, M. Fall, P. Hanno and U. Wesselmann J Urol 2006; 175: 1989-1990.J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1203; author reply 1203. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.004. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17296449 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
